1. Risk Register
  2. Change Log
  3. Probabilities
  4. Impacts
  5. Scoring
  6. Risk Categories

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU
1 Risk Identification and Tracking Pre-Mitigated Risk Evaluation Current Risk Response Comments / Notes Risk Cost Exposure Risk Schedule Exposure Major Risk Flag Post-Mitigated Qualitative Risk Evaluation Risk Retirement Timeframe Remaining Contingency Remaining Contingency
2 Revision History Probability and Impacts Initial Risk Exposure     NSF $ Unit of weeks Probability and Impacts Resulting Risk Exposure    
3 Risk ID Associated WBS Risk Description Risk Title Risk Origin Date Last modified Date Risk Retirement Date Risk Probability Impact on schedule Impact on cost Impact on technical performance Schedule Risk Score Cost Risk Score Technical Performance Risk Score Risk Owner (Can be NSF!) Risk Occurrence Timeframe Risk Handling Approach / Response Risk Trigger Risk Mitigation Plan and Actions Basis of Estimate for Risk/Schedule Exposure & Range Risk Cost Exposure Low Estimate Average Estimate High Estimate Risk Schedule Exposure Low Estimate High Estimate Risk Probability [%] Impact on schedule [weeks] Impact on cost [$] Impact on technical performance Schedule Risk Score [weeks] Cost Risk Score [$] Technical Performance Risk Score Expected Actual PY1-18/19 PY2-19/20 PY3-20/21 PY4-21/22 PY5-22/23 PY6-23/24 PY6-23/24 PY6-23/24    
4 1.1 Project Office                        
5 EXT1 1.1.4 Fuel Delivery Delayed - Less fuel is on hand in the drill season than the project requires - drilling operations impacted Fuel Delays 12/13/2018 6/24/2022 High High Low Moderate High Moderate Moderate NSF FS2 & FS3 Mitigate ASC communication in 2022 Communicate the fuel requirements to ASC and NSF as early as possible and monitor. Fuel requirements will be in the SIP and are confirmed by the RSP. Can mitigate by dropping the cold reaming of some of the drill holes to save fuel at a cost of increased analysis effort in order for the calibration quality to be kept good. Postdoc time 1 FTE+/-20% to analyze additional calibration efforts for the bubble column (if de-gassing not done) or scope decrease in deep ice measurements. $100,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 0 0 0 5% 0 $ 100,000.00 Moderate (lower quality hole ice) 0 $5,000.00 Moderate FS3 $36,000 $36,000 $36,000 $36,000 $36,000    
6 EXT2 1.1.4 Winter Storage DNF Failure - McMurdo or South Pole winter storage heat failure damages equipment/sensors DNF Heat Failure 12/13/2018 6/24/2022 Low High High Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate NSF 22/23,23/24, or 24/25 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Work with ASC to select DDC monitored warehouse space. Package DNF shipments into 48" x 48" x 48" crate sizes or smaller. Reduce DNF shipment volume by removing environmentally sensitive components for subsystems and shipping separately. Could require a 1/4 of a field season of effort (4 weeks) or up to 10% of the value of the stored equipment and instrumentation. (each week of a delay in Field Season 3 costs 98,560) $227,120 $25,000 $894,240 2 0 4 2% 2 $ 227,120.00 Low (5% level of modules affected) 0.04 $4,542.40 Low    
7 ORG1 1.1.4 If schedule delays lead to less than full complement of optical modules for delivery, then air shipment is required Optical modules by air 8/2/2018 Moderate Very low Low Very low Low Moderate Low OM lead Karg Shipping deadlines Mitigate Schedule slip Plan for some air shipments which could cover last modules, keep on top of deliveries Shipping estimate - difference truck PTH vs COMAIR to CHC $12,000 $5,000 $25,000 0 0 2 10% 0 $ 12,000.00 0 0 $1,200.00 0    
8 EXT3 1.1.4 Traverse Delays - Weather or equipment problems impacts overland cargo movement of IceCube equipment to NPX. Traverse Delays 12/13/2018 6/24/2022 Low Moderate Low Very low Moderate Low Low NSF 22/23 or 23/24 Mitigate Communication from Traverse Leader that delivery to NPX is delayed. Detailed and regular planning meetings with ASC. Track traverse metrics on meeting delivery to NPX commitments. Use scheduling software to run deliver delay scenarios to assess impact and plan mitigations. Risk Cost is related to additonal labor hours needed to recover from late delivery. From the sensitivity analysis for late cargo deliveries. $25,000 $5,000 $40,000 2 0 4 4% 2 $ 25,000.00 0 0.08 $1,000.00 0    
9 EXT4 1.1.4 Domestic/International Shipping Delays - Equipment being shipped to PTH, or to Christchurch is delayed in route. Shipping Delays 12/13/2018 6/24/2022 Low Moderate Moderate Very low Moderate Moderate Low NSF 22/23 or 23/24 Mitigate Forwarder provides ETA estimates or updates that are beyond the planned USAP Required-on-Site (ROS) date Plan shipments departure with 2-4 weeks of schedule contingency built in. Ship early when possible. Choose early ship mode keeping an other mode in reserve (i.e. a shipment is planned for FY23 vessel where the shipment arrives in McMurdo, overwinters, and completes its journey in FY24. In this case the Port Hueneme delivery deadline is missed. The shipment is then sent via commerical surface (COMSUR) in FY24 to New Zealand where it is flown by C17 to McMurdo.) Add cost for shipping via air to CHC. $12,000 $5,000 $25,000 2 0 4 15% 2 $ 12,000.00 0 0.3 $1,800.00 0    
10 EXT5 1.1.4 Contractor On-Ice Support - trades support is not available to assist the project, as planned. ASC Support 12/13/2018 6/24/2022 Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low NSF 22/23 or 23/24 Mitigate Communication from ASC Science Support staff that Upgrade project will not get agreed upon support. Detailed planning meetings with ASC. Review submitted SIP each year. Confirm support in RSP matches needs identified in the SIP. Staff drill team with diverse skillsets as contingency (i.e. electricians, mechanics, equipment operators, & plumbers). Calculated based on the ASC time and labor estimates. $52,738 $26,369 $105,476 2 1 4 10% 2 $ 52,738.00 0 0.2 $5,273.80 0    
11 ORG2 1.1.3 Major injury occurs during drill season, but not associated with drilling. Work stoppage occurs until review is performed and "safe to proceed" determined. M&O Injury 8/2/2018 2/28/2022 Moderate Low Moderate Very low Moderate Moderate Low Safety Mgr Zernick Field season 3 Mitigate Injury Extensive safety program training before and on the ice, procedure for handling injury root case analysis, procedure for reauthorizing work. Design engineered safety controls throughout to assist mitigation. Cost of 2 week work stoppage at Pole. 2-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 80hr x average rate of $88/hour =$197,200k. Low/High for 1 wk; 3 wks.
$197,120 $98,560 $0 $295,680 2 1 3 1% 2 $ 197,120.00 0 0.02 $1,971.20 0 25/26    
12 EXT6 1.1.4 LC130 mission delays affect equipment or personnel delivery to the South Pole in FS3 - delays drilling by 2 weeks. Logistics Delays 8/15/2018 Low Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low NSF Field season 3 Watch Weather/Aircraft Monitor logistics and maintain communications throughout the logistics chain for potential technical impacts. Develop flexible and robust work plans. Use scheduling software to run deliver delay scenarios to assess impact and plan mitigations As above, ORG2. $197,120 $98,560 $0 $295,680 2 1 3   10% 2 $ 197,120.00 Very Low 0.2 $19,712.00 Low    
13 PM1 1.1 Inflation is high at the moment, in fact in many areas the one year inflation rate is 20% or higher. Inflation: equipment 3/3/2022 High Low Moderate Low Moderate High Moderate PD 2022 Watch Cost inflation Monitor new quotations. Most purchases of CapEx are complete already. This might be larger effect in salaries and indirect, see PM2 risk. 25% of PY5-8 costs not including labor, not compounded $400,000 $320,000 $480,000 2 0 8 75% 2 $ 400,000.00 Low 1.5 $300,000.00 Low    
14 PM2 1.1 Current job market would require higher salaries for personnel replacements Inflation: personnel 3/3/2022 High Moderate Moderate Low High High Moderate PD 2022 Mitigate Morale and/or job market Explicit efforts at improving morale, salary increases, increased workplace flexibility. 20% increase on 25% of key roles for PY5-8 labor rates, difficulties in finding new personnel $600,000 $500,000 $750,000 12 4 26 75% 12 $ 600,000.00 Very Low 9 $450,000.00 Low    
15 EXT19 1.1 Logistics pathway flexibility is in the best interest of the project, however, sensitive ICU equipment and/or materials could sustain damage during overland shipment. There is no data, currently on forces incurred during overland transport. Shipment Damage 6/24/2022 6/24/2022 NSF FS0 thru FS3 Mitigate Evidence of equipment damage during shipment. Attach an accelerometer to a traverse shipment to determine actual shock and vibration exposure for the shipment. Estimated based on a pallet of DOMs which could be destroyed. Any other single box/crate being damaged is likely less than $50k approximately. $50,000 $10,000 $100,000 8 0 16 33% 8 $ 50,000.00 Very Low 2.64 $16,500.00 Low    
16 EXT24 1.1 Logistics leg failure probabilites, provided by AIL, are medium to high in key project cargo pathways. A high risk probability has been assigned to the FY24 LC130 leg and medium probability to FY23 vessel, FY25-FY26 LC130 and FY23-FY26 South Pole Traverse 3. NSF provided logistics probability of success 7/1/2022 7/6/2022 NSF FS0 thru FS3 Mitigate Release of failure probability adjustment (May 22) to AIL logistics capacities Shift fuel delivery plan to overland transport from LC130 transport by using four 25k liter ISO tank containers. Develop new S. Pole DNF strategy to allow for overwintering of a greater number of string components. Continue to work collaboratively with AIL/ASC to plan and execute project logistics. Basis of schedule exposure derived from AIL's stated logistics pathway probability of failure ranging from medium to high. Cost exposure comes from schedule delay in FS3. This is the residual risk after the fuel tank purchase. $295,680 $197,120 $394,240 3 2 4   3% 3 $ 295,680.00 Low 0.09 $8,870.40 Low    
17 PM3 1.1 Cost and schedule for training / moving to enterprise level tools are underestimated, requiring additional people / resources. This does not impact the technical schedule. PCMS issues 7/15/2022 7/22/2022 High Moderate Moderate Low High High Moderate PD 2022 thru end of project Mitigate Cost/Schedule for PCMS estimate increasing Weekly meetings with contractors. Initially working with two vendors until full migration. Additional 0.5 FTEs over 4 years (for a total of 2 FTEs). FTEs are costed at average contractor rates ($150/hour) * 53% overhead. Low Estimate is 1 FTE, high and most likely are 2 FTE. This cost may be either for additional contractor work, or additional project management / project office work for interfacing with the contractors. $830,000 $415,000 $830,000 12 4 26 10% 0 $ 830,000.00 Very Low 0 $83,000.00 Low    
18 PM4 1.1/1.2 The logistics and drill manager is 1 FTE. Recent increases in load on logistics management may necessitate additional effort for drill management. Insufficient personnel for logistics / drill management 7/15/2022 7/22/2022 PD 2022 thru end of project Mitigate Logistics load necessitates full FTE Assuming we need the original 0.5 FTE for drill managemet. Low estimate is 0.25, High is 1 FTE $103,500 $51,750 $207,000 75% $ 103,500.00 Very Low $77,625.00    
19 1.2 Northern Risks          
20 TECH1 1.2.4 Unable to complete controls system work on-schedule due to cargo front-loading and/or staffing limitations. Delay in Drill Control Systems Development Risk 1 4/2/2020 3/2/2022 Low Moderate High High Moderate Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Projected missed ship date April 2022 status review of the drill control systems, supplement staff Bring in extra 1FTE x 6mo to catch up $103,500 $60,000 $150,000 6 2 8   20% 6 $ 103,500.00 Low 1.2 $20,700.00 Low    
21 TECH2 1.2.4 Unable to make critical controls hardware procurements (motor drives, DGH's servers, sensors, etc) on-schedule due to vendor shortages and transportation delays. Delay in Drill Control Systems Development Risk 2 4/2/2020 3/2/2022 Moderate Moderate Moderate High Moderate Moderate High Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Projected missed ship date Comsur shipments, supplement staff Bring in extra 1FTE x 6mo to catch up $103,500 $60,000 $150,000 10 4 12 40% 10 $ 103,500.00 Low 4 $41,400.00 Moderate    
22 TECH3 1.2.4 Delay in development of user interfaces, control algorithms, and hands-on integration and test activities due to Test Bed limitations. Delay in Drill Control Systems Development Risk 3 4/2/2020 3/2/2022 Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Control software not on track for proper maturity by the field season it is needed Additional outfitting of testBed equipment, additional effort in project out-years $50k equipment investment in TestBed + (0.5FTE x 6mo) to support the investment $101,750 $60,000 $150,000 8 4 12   25% 8 $ 101,750.00 Low 2 $25,437.50 Low    
23 TECH4 1.2 Loss of key drilling expertise/personnel Loss of Drill Expertise 2/21/2022 3/2/2022 Moderate Moderate Moderate High Moderate Moderate High Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Loss of key personnel Keep key staff engaged Project delays may result in key personnel leaving before new staff have been able to acquire skillset. 0.25FTE x 6mo recruit and train per new employee, assume 4 new employees $103,500 $60,000 $150,000 12 10 20 30% 12 $ 103,500.00 Moderate 3.6 $31,050.00 Moderate    
24 TECH5 1.2 Novel string installation - Final down-hole cable design requires the development of new equipment and processes for installation (i.e. New rope reel with coordinated load sharing) Novel String Installation - Equip 2/21/2022 3/2/2022 Moderate Moderate High Moderate Moderate High Moderate Implementation Mgr 2022 Mitigate Final determination of down hole installation cable Handling system for the rope reel and load sharing coordination Define requirements, design, procure, fab/assem/integrate, testing changes depending on final downhole cable $120,000 $60,000 $200,000 24 16 40 50% 24 $ 120,000.00 Low 12 $60,000.00 Moderate    
25 TECH53 1.2 Because design and testing of the load sharing technique is critical and cannot delay the off-ice drill schedule, additional effor may be needed to validate / test load sharing for the drill head / drill hose. Load sharing effort underestimated 7/15/2022 7/22/2022 Low Moderate High High Moderate Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr 2023 Mitigate Load sharing testing / design Suplement staff if needed. Do not allow this design/test to delay the schedule. Bring in additional people; up to 1 FTE in order not to delay the schedule. $207,000 $103,500 $207,000 0 0 0   20% 0 $ 207,000.00 Low 0 $41,400.00 Low    
26 TECH54 1.2 Because the EHWD is a specialty item, reviews of design / operations with drill experts may be necessary to validate the design. Drill Advisory Panel 7/15/2022 7/22/2022 Low Moderate High High Moderate Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr FY23-FY25 Mitigate Need for additional oversight / review of drill system Reconstitute the Drill Advsiory Panel and review the drill preparation work twice yearly. Travel / labor for twice yearly reviews. 4 DAP members x $1.8k travel + 160 hours labor for drill team (10 x 2 8 hour days) = $51.2k/year x 3 years. Low estimate and most probable value is 1 rev. / year, high estimate 2 reviews/year. $153,600 $153,600 $307,200 0 0 0   30% 0 $ 153,600.00 Low 0 $46,080.00 Low    
27 1.2 Field Season Risks                
28 TECH6 1.2 Unable to dispose of condensate into onsite SES condensate bulb Unable to dispose of Condensate 2/21/2022 3/2/2022 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Implementation Mgr FS1 Mitigate Results of ASC environmental decision Request additional equipment/ops/resources to transport condensate to outfall and dispose there, or to ship off-site Sled and barrell system (5k) + extra handling time adds 1/2 week of full drill team (49,300). Additional ASC handling support not captured here. Low estimate is just for the sled and barrel system. High is 1 week of full drill team + Sled/Barrel system. $49,305 $5,000 $98,605 .5 0 1 1% .5 $ 49,305.00 Low 0.005 $493.05 Low    
29 ORG4 1.2 Serious FS3 injury or incident occurance halts on-ice activities until full accident investigation Serious Driller/Deployer Injury/incident FS3 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Moderate Very High Very High Moderate High High Moderate Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Any number of reasons Thorough safety training as well as systems and individual hazards analysis performed throughout the EHWD. All those deploying to Pole will receive SafeStart Training. Other mitigations are outlined in the IceCube Upgrade Safety Plan. Further, IceCube Upgrade Management plans to hire experienced persons to deploy to Pole. Make full plan with the contractor for an accident investigation process ahead of time. Experience from Gen1 gives schedule delay estimate (1-3wks, most likely 2 weeks). For full drill tream (as calculated above) 1 week is 98,560. $197,120 $98,560 $197,120 $295,680 2 1 3   1% 2 $ 197,120.00 Low 0.02 $1,971.20 Low FS3 end $147,450 $147,450 $147,450 $147,450 $147,450    
30 ORG5 1.2 Serious FS2 season injury or incident occurance halts on-ice activities until full accident investigation is completed Serious Driller/Deployer Injury/incident FS2 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Moderate Very High Very High Low High High Moderate Implementation Mgr FS2 Mitigate Any number of reasons Thorough safety training as well as systems and individual hazards analysis performed throughout the EHWD. All those deploying to Pole will receive SafeStart Training. Other mitigations are outlined in the IceCube Upgrade Safety Plan. Further, IceCube Upgrade Management plans to hire experienced persons to deploy to Pole. FS2=16 drillers*40hrs/week*$88/hr = 56,320/week. $112,640 $56,320 $112,640 $168,960 2 1 3   1% 2 $ 112,640.00 Low 0.02 $1,126.40 Low FS2 end $147,450 $147,450 $147,450 $147,450 $147,450    
31 ORG6 1.2 1.2Serious FS1 season injury or incident occurance halts on-ice activities Serious Driller/Deployer Injury/incident FS1 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Moderate Low Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr FS1 Mitigate Any number of reasons Thorough safety training as well as systems and individual hazards analysis performed throughout the EHWD. All those deploying to Pole will receive SafeStart Training. Other mitigations are outlined in the IceCube Upgrade Safety Plan. Further, IceCube Upgrade Management plans to hire experienced persons to deploy to Pole. FS1=11 drillers*40hrs/week*$88/hr = 38,720/week. $77,440 $38,720 $77,440 $116,160 2 1 3   1% 2 $ 77,440.00 Low 0.02 $774.40 Low FS1 end $147,450 $147,450 $147,450 $147,450 $147,450    
32 TECH7 1.2 Major Drill Season Equipment Failure such as main hose reel failure, or a stuck drill head losing the cable and hose, or a fire damages the main heating plant, results in season stoppage and additional drilling season. Major Equipment Failure or Fire 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Very High Very High Low Moderate Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Diligent Hazards Analysis, risk mitigation planning, and training. Procedures, experienced crew. Spares. Firefighting training. Emergency procedures. Some scenarios might be recoverable, but many would require an additional (unavailable) drill season, worst case calculation here: drill team ~ 8engr + 20techs, ave rate = 88/hr
(3.5mo/12)*1800hr/yr = 525 hr/season:28*88*525 = 1.3M + training = 193k, PQ/travel = 244k => Another drill season = 1.74M
Another offseason (lite) ~ 300k; Heating plant $800k
Total = 2.8M max for drilling, possible range very wide. In addition we add the costs for an additional year of 1.1 (Project Office) = $1,330M (approximately $430k in finance/PCMS, $450k in PM (including PI, PD, PM, travel) and $450k in safety, technical coordination, logistics. Depending on the issues and the needs of the PO, this could range between $700k - 1,330M. The cost of an additional drilling season from above is $1.74M. An additional $800k in the maximum estimate is given for equipment replacement / refurbishment. The low estimate represents a 2 week delay in drilling, but no additional field season or extension to the PO. The most likely cost includes a full FS3 + the low end of the PO costs, but no additional equipment costs.
$2,440,000 $197,120 $2,183,560 $4,170,000 52 2 52 1% 52 $ 2,440,000.00 Very High 0.52 $24,400.00 Moderate FS3 end $368,625 $368,625 $368,625 $368,625 $368,625      
33 ORG7 1.2.8 Driller Talent Aquisition and Retention - EHWD drill operation in Antarctica is unique and specific skill-set. Recruiting experienced drillers key for project success Drillers recruitment 8/15/2018 3/2/2022 High High High Low High High Moderate Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Recruitment struggles Intiate staffing planning and recruitment early. Network with and engage experienced drillers in the search. Develop training plans. Engage collaboration early on for contributed drillers. Allow for flexibility with deployments. Increased salary costs to recruit/entice experience.  16 direct-hires increased salaries (average) across 2 seasons
TECH rate -> ENGR rate, delta $38/hr, 525 hr/season
16*2*38*525 = 640k
$640,000 $300,000 $550,000 $800,000 12 8 16 20% 12 $ 640,000.00 Low 2.4 $128,000.00 Low FS2-FS3 end $54,000 $54,000 $54,000 $54,000 $54,000 $ - 0 $ - 0
34 TECH8 1.2.4 Insufficient IV&T of Control System results in control failure during drilling delaying drill operations Control System Problem 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Robust testing in CONUS of sub-assemblies. Complete install in FS2 with full testing. 1/2-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 40hr
$49,280 $0 $147,840 .5 0 1.5 10% .5 $ 49,280.00 Low 0.05 $4,928.00 Low FS3 end $10,500 $10,500 $10,500 $10,500 $10,500    
35 EXT7 1.2.3 Logistics delays in FS1 & FS2 could lead to the need for additional labor in FS2 and FS3 to be ready for drilling in FS3 Logistics and Cargo 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Moderate High Moderate Moderate High Moderate Moderate NSF FS3 Mitigate ASC communication in 2022 Communicate cargo requirements to ASC and NSF as early as possible and monitor. Cargo requirements will be in the SIP and are confirmed by the RSP. 15% loss of field season assumed. Cost includes labor and travel. (15 week season) $224,000 $100,000 $350,000 $600,000 2 1 4 15% 2 $ 224,000.00 Low 0.3 $33,600.00 Low FS1 & FS2 end $22,400 $22,400 $22,400 $22,400 $0    
36 TECH10 1.2.2 Main Heater Failures - Heater failures during drilling operations force drill speed to be decreased, or descope of cold reaming or dust logging MHP Failures 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Low Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Pressure testing in FS1. Full system testing in FS2. React with repairs/replacements, and/or supplement with WISSARD HPUs. Extensive failures would potentially add more than 1 week during drill season. Testing in FS1 and FS2 mitigates this. $98,560 $0 $147,840 1 0 1.5   5% 1 $ 98,560.00 Low 0.05 $4,928.00 Low FS3 end    
37 TECH11 1.2.3 Tower - Fatigue, overload, or unforeseen circustances results in failure of crescent, sheaves, hoist, or structural components Tower failure 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Perform detailed structural inspection and maintenance in FS1. Load testing performed during load cell calibration in FS2. Crescent emergency repair kit. 1/2-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 40hr
$49,280 $0 $147,840 .5 0 1.5 5% .5 $ 49,280.00 Low 0.025 $2,464.00 Low FS3 end    
38 TECH12 1.2.3 Drill Head Communication Failure - Communication from drillhead during drilling operations ceases Drill Head Problems 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Thorough system testing in CONUS. 1x spare drillhead on-site (3 total). Develop Guidelines for "Drilling Blind." max 1-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 40hr
$0 $0 $98,560 0 0 1 10% 0 $ - 0 Low 0 $- Low FS3 end    
39 TECH13 1.2.3 Hose/Cable Reel Failure - One or both reels develop major motor, level-wind, or technical problem and deemed non-functional. On-site repair required. Main Reel Failure 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 low High Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error MDCR rebuild and comprehensive testing in CONUS. DSHR operational tests in FS1 and FS2. 1-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 40hr
$98,560 $98,560 $197,120 1 1 2   10% 1 $ 98,560.00 Low 0.1 $9,856.00 Low FS3 end    
40 TECH14 1.2 Cut/Damaged Drill Hose - Equipment or unknowns damage the main drill hose. Damaged Drill Hose 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Very low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Proper visible flagging and markings installed. There will be 5 spare sections of hose on site in FS3. A procedure for replacing a section of the hose will be reviewed. 1/2-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 40hr
$49,280 $0 $98,560 .5 0 1 10% .5 $ 49,280.00 Low 0.05 $4,928.00 Low FS3 end    
41 TECH15 1.2 Cut/Damaged Drill Cable - Equipment or unknowns end up damaging the main drill cable. Damaged Drill Cable 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Very low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Proper visible flagging and markings installed. Two brand-new cables will be supplied to the Pole for use in FS2 1/2-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 40hr
$49,280 $49,280 $98,560 .5 .5 1 10% .5 $ 49,280.00 Low 0.05 $4,928.00 Low FS3 end    
42 EXT8 1.2 Drilling into obstructions/cables - The tight array is planned in an area with possible "old station" debris Drill obstructions 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Moderate Very low Moderate Low Low Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Unknown GPR scans completed during '19-20 season were inconclusive. Request has been made for a new GPR scan. Firn Holes will be drilled one-year in advance to accommodate potential relocation of holes due to debris. 1-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 40hr
$98,560 $98,560 $197,120 1 1 2 25% 1 $ 98,560.00 Low 0.25 $24,640.00 Low FS3 end $10,500 $10,500 $10,500 $10,500 $0    
43 TECH16 1.2.6 Drill Hose gets exposed to deep freeze conditions. < -53 C, increased rate of hose failure during drill season. Frozen Drill Hose 3/10/2020 3/2/2022 High Low Moderate High Moderate High High Implementation Mgr Winter in between FS2 & FS3 Mitigate Environmental Implement hose heating system to heat hose on reel over winter. This was done successfully on Gen1. Keep hose temperature above brittle transition point of -53C. Monitoring will be in place. Hose failure mode: Blister formation on outside layer, not catastophic. Drillers trained to identify symptoms and replace immediately. Individual hose sections can be replaced, spare hose sections were ordered. If too many hoses fail, cannot drill to full depth.
1/2-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 80hr
$49,280 $0 $98,560 .5 0 1 10% .5 $ 49,280.00 High 0.05 $4,928.00 Moderate FS3 end    
44 TECH17 1.2.5 Motor Drive Problems - New motor drives have unforeseen problems Motor Drives 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS2 & FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Installation, programing, training, and testing of all motor drives while in CONUS. Installation and testing at NPX season prior to drilling. Train multiple drillers/ Engineers on how to maintain/troubleshoot the Allen Bradley Motor Drives. 1-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs
8engr + 20tech x 80hr
$98,560 $49,280 $197,120 1 .5 2 10% 1 $ 98,560.00 Very low 0.1 $9,856.00 Low FS2    
45 TECH18 1.2.6 High Pressure Pump Failure - Pump or pump motor fails prior to or during drilling operations HPP Failure 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Very low Low Low Low Low Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Procure additional spare pumps and motors. Provide driller training for field replacement during prior off-ice season. 1/2 week delay $49,280 $0 $98,560 .5 0 1 10% .5 $ 49,280.00 Low 0.05 $4,928.00 Low FS2 & FS3 end    
46 TECH19 1.2.6 Return Water Pump Failure - The RWP fails during drilling operations. RWP Failure 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Procure spare, develop replacement procedure, train drillers 1 day delay $49,280 $0 $98,560 .5 0 1 15% .5 $ 49,280.00 Low 0.075 $7,392.00 Low FS2 & FS3 end    
47 TECH20 1.2.7 Independent Firn Drill Failure - Serious problems result in the inoperability of the IFD during FS2 IFD Failure 12/13/2018 3/2/2022 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Implementation Mgr FS2 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Locate and update original plans and equipment (carrot with leaker-circuit) to firn drill using hot water. 1-week delay - longer season (short crew)In FS2, 1week labor= 16 drillers x 40 x $88/hr = 56,320 $28,160 $0 $56,320 .5 0 1 15% .5 $ 28,160.00 Low 0.075 $4,224.00 Low FS2    
48 TECH21 1.2.8 A majority of the EHWD equipment has been stored/cold-soaked for 6+ years at the South Pole. Risk of old EHWD equipment failure. Old EHWD Failure 8/15/2018 3/2/2022 Low High High Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr FS2 & FS3 Mitigate Failure upon followup inspections and testing during FS1. Thorough and robust testing performed in seasons prior to deep drilling. Identify most-at-risk equipment and procure additional spare parts or refurbish and repair equipment Offseason equipment budget to address (80k)
Additional on-ice work in FS2 ~ 2 week delay (112,640)
$192,640 $192,640 $417,920 2 2 6   15% 2 $ 192,640.00 Low 0.3 $28,896.00 Low FS3 end    
49 TECH22 1.2.5 Generators: Cargo delays or insufficient support prevent thorough IV&T prior to use, resulting in failures during use and delays during system testing in FS2 and/or drilling in FS3 Power Generation Failures 2/21/2022 3/2/2022 Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate NSF FS2 & FS3 Mitigate Logistics delays or contractor support issues Plan to use outside power generation contractor to support highly specialized power plant repairs, testing, and comissioning. Developed logistics plan that ships 2 generators to S. Pole in FY23 and send one (gen 2) off continent to a NZ Caterpillar Dealer for repairs. Developed work around plan should gen 2 arrive late at the S. Pole upon its return to Antarctica. Thoroughly communicated logistics plan to the contractor and AIL and will continue to do so. ICU outsourcing Gen2 repair by shipping unit to NZ and bringing contractor on-ice to support with final IV&T.
Capture as 1 week delay during drilling season should delays occur.
$98,560 $49,280 $197,120 1 .5 2 10% 1 $ 98,560.00 Low 0.1 $9,856.00 Low    
50 TECH23 1.2.9 88 South sleds are not available for use as sensor sleds. Sensor Handling - Sled inavailability 1/15/2021 2/8/2022 Moderate Low Low Low Moderate Moderate Moderate NSF prior to FS2 Mitigate Support Collaborate with ASC to find no cost or low cost solutions using on-ice materials if the 88 sleds not available. Request ASC a definite answer by end of 2022 at latest so alternative (including procurement and shipping) can be finalized in advance of FS2. Transport by Comsur & C-17 will be required to deliver materials by early FS2. Estimates from quotes and off shelf components, estimated on 2 sleds each with 5 AIPs and straps to connect AIPs to sleds and sensor pallets to AIPs. Heel, Toe and labor cost included in estimate. Additional time on ice to set the sleds up. $35,000 $32,000 $40,000 0 0 1   0% 0 $ 35,000.00 Low 0 $- Low prior to FS2    
51 TECH24 1.2.9 Solar Garage is not available for housing sensor testing operations. Sensor Handling - Tent 1/15/2021 2/8/2022 Moderate Low Low Low Moderate Moderate Moderate NSF prior to FS2 Mitigate Support Collaborate with ASC to find no cost or low cost solutions using tents available on ice. Request ASC a definite answer by end of 2022 at latest so alternative (including procurement and shipping) can be finalized in advance of FS2. Transport by Comsur & C-17 will be required to deliver materials by early FS2. Quote for a similar tent from BigTop. Shipping not included. Additional time on ice to set the tent up in Antarctica. Crew of 5, 4-5 days for a RAC tent, up to 2 weeks, with some crane support. $50,000 $45,000 $55,000 0 0 1   15% 0 $ 50,000.00 Low 0 $7,500.00 Low prior to FS2    
52 TECH25 1.2.10 Protect xDOM from ESD during staging and during installation. This includes sled transport, the DOM handling facility, and ESD protection while connecting the BCA to the PCA and BCA to Main Cable Assembly. ESD - Handle + Deploy 1/15/2021 1/24/2022 Moderate Very low Low Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Installation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Environmental ESD plan for installation. Bond Tower to GND. Charge bleeder connected to main cable in the spool. Re-examine failure in Gen1. Strict attention to ESD discipline and ESD training. ensure ESD charge neutralization to any cables prior to connecting or disconnecting xDevices Single DOM loss would not result in schedule shift or replacement cost. If major systematic problem occurred one week to revisit and fix issues. $0 0 0 1 15% 0 $ - 0 Low 0 $- Low FS3 end $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000    
53 TECH26 1.2.10 Failure of a harness or rigging element that would result in de-installing partially the string and swapping instrumentation/BCAs. Partial Un-installation of String 1/15/2021 6/23/2022 Low Very Low High Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Installation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Operator Error/Equipment Failure/Hardware Failure Set robust mechanical requirements (design and proof test) for each element (harness, pressure vessels, rigging pieces, yale grips). De-install procedure. Hole may need to be re-drilled if un-installation took long enough for the hole to be significantly closed. Used 53585/7 = 7655 gallons of fuel and 864 for base (2 days)= 8519 gallons, 25.45$/gallons (2019 price) = $216808. That's low estimate, no labor added assuming time needed can be absorbed in season. High estimate on fuel of 10000 gallons and assume one week extra labor for drillers full team. This includes that repositioning of hose and reels may take longer as operations need go be going backwards compared to drill sequence. ($70,214). Average for Risk Cost Exposure. $270,761 $216,808 $382,900 .5 0 1   8% .5 $ 270,761.00 Low 0.04 $21,660.88 Low FS3 end    
54 TECH27 1.2.10 Failure of a harness or rigging element that would result in partial loss of string, unknown during installation String Partial Loss 1/15/2021 6/23/2022 Low Very Low Very Low High Low Low Moderate Installation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Operator Error/Equipment Failure/Hardware Failure Set robust mechanical requirements (design and proof test) for each element (harness, pressure vessels, rigging pieces, yale grips) No cost or schedule slip as this risk assumes installation team does not know this. Loss of performance only. $0 0   3% 0 $ - 0 High 0 $- Low FS3 end    
55 TECH28 1.2.10 Failure of a harness or rigging element that would result in total loss of string (string is stuck during drop, or installation cannot continue and de-installation cannot happen, instrumentation already installed is abandoned) String Total Loss 1/15/2021 1/25/2022 Low High Very High Very High Moderate Moderate Moderate Installation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Operator Error/Equipment Failure/Hardware Failure Set robust mechanical requirements (design and proof test) for each element (harness, pressure vessels, rigging pieces, yale grips). Contingency time accounted for each installation step in hole lifetime calculation and prescribed drill charts. Mitigation greatly reduces probability. String could not be replaced so no cost or schedule risk, only loss of performance. $0 0   3% 0 $ - 0 High 0 $- Low FS3 end    
56 TECH29 1.2.10 Dust Logger winch failure Dust Logger Winch 12/13/2018 1/25/2022 Low Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Installation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Test Winch and Dust Logger Comms as soon as they are delivered to Pole, and at tower once electrical connections are established. If maulfunction happens prior to Dust Logger run start: establish Abort Time Prior to Start, postpone Dust Logger Run to next (last hole). Last hole will need to be made larger to accomodate dust logger run. low estimate of 110 gal (difference between a deep cold ream hole and a hot + log hole) => 110*25.45= $2800. High estimate 10% fuel (800 gal) to account for possible re-ordering of holes. $2,800 $2,800 $20,360 0 0 0 25% 0 $ 2,800.00 Low 0 $700.00 Low FS3 end    
57 TECH30 1.2.10 String Installation Winch Failure - The TU20 winch fails during installation operations. TU-20 needs to be swapped out TU-20 Failure 12/13/2018 1/25/2022 Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Installation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Inspect and repair both TU-20's to full operation. Create Installation Cable Swap-Out Procedure. <1-day delay - would be absorbed in the FS $ - 0 0 0 0 10% 0 $ - 0 Low 0 $- Low FS3 end    
58 1.3 Deep Ice Sensor Modules          
59 EXT9 1.3.1 If electronics parts for the mDOM Mainboard cannot be procured in time, the mDOM production and testing will be delayed mDOM Electronics Supply Chain 1/27/2022 High Moderate Low Low High Moderate Moderate OM Lead Until procurement Mitigate External Continuously monitor market throughout collaboration and centrally collect information of availability of critical components
Place orders / publish calls for tender as early as possible
Develop plans for series integration of half-mDOMs, add in mainboards as late as possible
Air shipping to New Zealand might be required if parts are sufficiently delayed. Off project cost. Critical path schedule delay would be zero if air shipping is utilized as long as parts show up by mid-2023. Cost risk is off-award $ - 0 $0 $0 $0 26 12 52 75% 26 $ - 0 Low 19.5 $- Low    
60 EXT10 1.3.1 If suppliers don't have sufficient capacity to 3D-print mDOM PMT Support Structures, the mDOM production and testing will be delayed mDOM Support Structure Supply Chain 1/27/2022 Moderate Moderate Low Low Moderate Moderate Moderate OM Lead Until procurement Mitigate External Foresee production of PMT Support Structures in several batches that can be tendered to different manfufacturers Air shipping to New Zealand might be required if parts are sufficiently delayed. Off project cost. Critical path schedule delay would be zero if air shipping is utilized as long as parts show up by mid-2023. Cost risk is off-award $ - 0 $0 $0 $0 4 0 26 5% 4 $ - 0 Low 0.2 $- Low    
61 TECH33 1.3.1 If mDOM series production does not reach the projected rate of 9 mDOMs / site / week, the shipping date for the mDOMs for Strings 87+88 will be missed mDOM Production Yield 1/27/2022 Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Low mDOM Lead Until OM shipping Mitigate Technical problems Produce mDOM test batches at DESY and MSU as early as possible to excercise integration and FAT procedures
see also risk ORG5
Air shipping to New Zealand might be required if parts are sufficiently delayed. Off project cost. Critical path schedule delay would be zero if air shipping is utilized as long as parts show up by mid-2023. Cost risk is off-award $ - 0 $0 $0 $0 4 0 26 10% 4 $ - 0 Low 0.4 $- Low    
62 EXT11 1.3 If integrated sensors have to be stored for too long before installation, the vacuum seal might leak and re-sealing might become necessary Sensor Long-Term Storage 6/23/2022 Low High Low Low Moderate Low Low OM Lead Until installation readiness review Mitigate Regularly monitor the inside pressure of a sample of stored sensors
Store sensors such that they are accessible for monitoring (not McM?)
If stored sensors are accessible for regular monitoring, the problem can be detected early and sensors can be un-sealed and re-sealed at a rate of about 5 sensors / day. Off project cost $ - 0 $0 $0 $0 8 4 12 5% 8 $ - 0 Very low 0.4 $- Low    
63 TECH34 1.3.2 If during D-Egg FAT a high failure rate or design flaw is found, reworking D-Eggs will lead to significant cost and schedule slippage D-Egg FAT Yield 1/27/2022 Low Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate D-Egg Lead Until FAT Mitigate Commence D-Egg FAT as early as possible
Work closely with D-Egg team on executing and interpreting FAT
Even a minor re-work of all (300) sealed D-Eggs is a major undertaking, requiring un-sealing, re-sealing and re-testing all modules. Off project cost $ - 0 $0 $0 $0 26 12 52 5% 26 $ - 0 Low 1.3 $- Low    
64 EXT12 1.3.5 If one of the Special Devices is not delivered, the string design must be updated and verified Special Device Cancellation 1/15/2022 1/27/2022 Very High Low Low Very low Moderate Moderate Moderate OM Lead, installation Lead Until installation readiness review Mitigate Start early developing contingency plans how to replace or bypass missing Special Devices during installation Can be managed in close to real time, perhaps a couple of days schedule slip on the ice or slight risk of degraded performance $ - 0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 50% 0 $ - 0 Very low 0 $- Low    
65 TECH35 1.3.3 Because upgrade penetrator is different than Gen1 penetrator, the refurbished PDOMs must have the Gen1 penetrators removed and re-sealed with upgrade penetrators. Replacing penetrator may introduce subtle flaws that could cause PV flooding after installation at depth. PDOM PV leak 1/15/2022 6/23/2022 Low Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low PDOM Lead Until after freeze-in Mitigate No comms with deployed PDOM Inspection of sealing surfaces, comparison of Gen1 and Gen2 PCA sealing surfaces, High Pressure testing. If detected before installation of remaining strings, a short work stoppage for analysis of the problem might be required costed as a two-day delay. If sealing defects are sporadic, it may result in some number of PDOMs not surviving installation at depth. $ 20,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 30,000.00 0 0 1 5% 0 $ 20,000.00 Low 0 $1,000.00 Low    
66 EXT18 1.3.1 If mDOM planned main board electronics parts remain unavailable, a mainboard redesign will be required: this includes hardware design effort (off Project budget) and software & firmware effort (on Project budget). mDOM redesign 4/6/2022 6/23/2022 High Moderate High Low High High Moderate mDOM lead Calendar 2022 Mitigate Parts delivery delays/unavailable parts Begin planning and design work ahead of risk trigger on the new mainboard design On project cost: need 1 FTE-year of software effort and 1/2 FTE-year of firmware work. $ 240,000.00 $ 160,000.00 $ 320,000.00 52 26 78 85% 52 $ 240,000.00 Low 44.2 $204,000.00 Low    
67 TECH36 1.3 Because NPX is very dry, sensor electronics could be damaged by ESD during xDOM testing or installation at NPX xDOM Electronics ESD Damage 1/15/2022 6/23/2022 Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low OM Lead, Installation Lead Until OM installation Mitigate Modules failures, procedure errors during installation Employ appropriate internal ESD protection circuitry in the xDOM and ICM. Ensure that ESD mitigation is used on floors, people, and equipment at NPX. Ensure charge neutralization is emplloyed by procedure and equipment during NPX testing. Ensure by equipment design and operational procedure that charge neutralization is present between electrical cables, TOS and xDOMs as they are being deployed. If process problems with ESD at South Pole, a work stoppage for renewing procedures might be required. Costed as a week delay. 1-week delay for full drill team - additional labor costs $ 98,560.00 $ - 0 $ 98,560.00 $ 197,120.00 1 0 2 2% 1 $ 98,560.00 Low 0.02 $1,971.20 Low    
68 EXT20 1.3 Because there is critical in-kind contributed labor from DESY, MSU, and Chiba to complete the mDOMs and D-Eggs, the project would be impacted if this labor were lost Loss of In-Kind Labor (WBS 1.3) 6/27/2022 OM Lead Until OM shipping Accept Loss of key personnel Estimate 1 FTE-year of engineering labor, 3 month delay from onboarding. The main risk areas are mDOM Mainboard engineering and mDOM integration and testing coordination at DESY and MSU. Assuming a 15% probability that one of these three critical roles will have to be replaced $ 150,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 250,000.00 13 4 26 15% 13 $ 150,000.00 Low 1.95 $22,500.00 Low    
69 TECH52 1.3.1, 1.3.2 Because there is no long-term experience with the Shin-Etsu optical gel, non-desirable degradation of the optical gel of the mDOMs and D-Eggs might be observed only late in the project. Optical Gel Long-Term Performance 7/1/2022 7/1/2022 OM Lead During the full detector lifetime Mitigate Degradation of optical gel Long-term testing of DVT OMs in a freezer at nominal operations temperature. Rework of some modules before shipping might lead to delays. Cost is off-award. 1 FTE-year of a PostDoc to improve calibration if modules with different-than-expected optical performance are installed. $ 100,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 200,000.00 13 0 26 5% 13 $ 100,000.00 Moderate 0.65 $5,000.00 Low    
70 1.4 Comms, Power, and Timing (CPT) Distribution System        
71 TECH37 1.4.1.1 Because the MCA prototype has not completed mechanical testing, we may need to revise the main cable design, which will require additional design and testing effort and delay the start of production. Main cable design iteration 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Low High Low Very low Moderate Low Low 1.4 L2 Lead Summer 2022 Accept (near-future) Unsatisfactory prototype test N/A Schedule impact depends on magnitude of changes required -- an additional prototype cycle could take 1/2 year, while minor changes could be completed in a few weeks. Cost impact limited to on-project engineering labor, likely ~1 FTE-month $ 15,000 $0 $30,000 20 6 40   0% 20 $ 15,000.00 0 0 $- 0    
72 TECH38 1.4.1 Because the MCA prototype has not completed mechanical testing, we may need to add a separate co-installed strength member to the Downhole Cable Assembly, which will increase installation complexity and require additional equipment. Strength member needed 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Moderate High Low Very low High Moderate Low 1.2 L2 Lead Summer 2022 Mitigate Unsatisfactory prototype test Begin preparing design for co-deployed rope and test prototype in advance of cable tests Estimated cost of ropes ($18k/string) is largely offset by reduced need for YaleGrips (approx. 60 omitted per string @ $270 each). Cost of additional winch etc. unknown. Time required for design of second winch system unknown. Rough guesses inserted. $ 25,000 $10,000   $60,000 4 2 12   25% 4 $ 25,000.00 0 1 $6,250.00 0    
73 TECH39 1.4.1 Because the MCA prototype has not completed mechanical testing, we may need to redesign the string hardware and installation procedures, which will require additional design effort, prototyping, and equipment testing. Deployment procedures 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Low Moderate Very Low Very Low Moderate Low Low 1.2 L2 Lead Summer 2022 Accept (near-future) Unsatisfactory prototype test N/A Design work plus prototyping/testing $ 5,000 $2,500   $10,000 6 4 12   10% 6 $ 5,000.00 0 0.6 $500.00 0    
74 TECH40 1.4.1.1 Because the MCA prototype has not completed mechanical testing, we may need to select an alternate Main Cable supplier, which will necessitate project support for cost and/or impact communications and timing performance Alternate cable 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Low Very high Very high Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate 1.4 L2 Lead Summer 2022 Mitigate Unsatisfactory prototype test Pursue development of alternate suppliers, procure cable samples where feasible Likely to be delays in switching to new main cable supplier, most vendors are less responsive than Hexatronic. $ 1,500,000 $300,000 $3,500,000 26 4 52   0% 26 $ 1,500,000.00 Moderate 0 $- Low    
75 TECH41 1.4.1.1 Because a MCA prototype has not yet been built, the overall diameter of the cable may be larger than estimated and not fit on the currently planned shipping/installation spool, which will require redesign of the spool, cable, and/or installation procedure and equipment Cable too large 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Very low Moderate Low Very Low Low Low Low 1.2 L2 Lead Until first MCA is complete (Aug 2023) Accept Prototype cable diameter is too large. Breakouts are too large Minimize cable diameter to preserve room on spool for breakout connections Design work, larger spools, potentially different equipment. Cost impact is a rough guess. $ 50,000 $10,000 $100,000 8 4 26   5% 8 $ 50,000.00 0 0.4 $2,500.00 0    
76 TECH42 1.4.1.1 Because a MCA prototype has not yet been built, the overall weight of the cable may be larger than estimated and exceed the limit of the currently planned shipping pallet and/or aircraft, which will require redesign of the cable, spool, or shipping pallet. Cable too heavy 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Very low Moderate Low Very low Low Low Low 1.4 L2 Lead Summer 2022 Accept Prototype cable is too heavy N/A Possible redesign of shipping pallet, requiring additional liaison with ASC and drill lead $ 30,000 $7,500 $45,000 16 4 24   2% 16 $ 30,000.00 0 0.32 $600.00 0    
77 TECH43 1.4.1.2 Because a BCA supplier has not been identified, we may need to make significant design changes, which will increase costs and could delay production of other cable elements BCA design iteration 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Low High Moderate Very low Moderate Moderate Low 1.4 L2 Lead 2022 Mitigate Issues during preliminary design Engage with potential suppliers as early as possible Restarted design phase could take several months, require several FTE-month of engineering effort. Cost of actual BCAs unlikely to be affected $ 25,000 $5,000 $75,000 16 2 26   5% 16 $ 25,000.00 0 0.8 $1,250.00 0    
78 TECH44 1.4.2 Because of connector supply chain disruptions, we may not be able to ship the SCAs or SJBs on the scheduled vessel, which will require them to be shipped ComSur the following year or eliminate the option of staging at McMurdo the season before installation. SCA delay 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Very low Low Low Very low Low Low Low 1.4 L2 Lead Until connectors are received Mitigate Connector delivery delayed beyond Aug 2022 Order connectors as early as possible (order placed May 2021). Complete first cables using Gen1 leftover connectors to validate assembly procedures. Test and utilize compatible connectors from alternative suppliers Cost of Comsur shipping estimated based on past shipments of large cables. Schedule impact central estimate reflects RDD for Comsur, low estimate is delay consistent with FY23 vessel, high estimate is shift to FY24 vessel $ 7,500 $6,000   $15,000 36 16 64   15% 36 $ 7,500.00 0 5.4 $1,125.00 0    
79 EXT13 1.4.3 Because of electronics supply chain disruptions, there may be delays in production of rev1 and/or rev2 FieldHubs, which would reduce the number of prototyping cycles available before we need to enter production. FieldHub delay 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Moderate High Very Low very low High Low Low DESY June 2023 (start of FieldHub production) Mitigate Delays in production of rev1/2 FieldHubs Finalize selection of FPGA and other long-lead components as early as possible, order as soon as practicable. Eliminate prototyping cycles rather than delaying production (FieldHub design is already quite mature) Elimination of prototyping cycle removes schedule impact at cost of slightly elevated technical risk $ - 0 $0 $0 0 0 16   50% 0 $ - 0 Low 0 $- Low    
80 EXT14 1.4.4.1 Because the vendor identified for the timing and communications hardware used in the FieldHub was recently acquired, the interface to the hardware may change or the product may be retired, which will require additional hardware development effort to change to a different timing node. White Rabbit supplier 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 Low High Low very low Moderate Low Low 1.4.4 L3 Lead Spring 2023 Mitigate Substantial changes to baseline timing solution Identify alternate suppliers or alternate timing fanout designs that can be implemented using parts currently on hand Alternative designs identified. Additional effort of 1±1 FTE-month required for design. $ 15,000 $0 $30,000 4 0 8   10% 4 $ 15,000.00 Very low 0.4 $1,500.00 Low    
81 ORG9 1.4.4.2 Because of increased mDOM and DEgg power consumption and remaining uncertainties around maximum device power consumption, the power distribution system may need to be redesigned for a higher DC voltage, which will require additional development effort. DOM power limit 1/27/2022 3/1/2022 High High Low Very low High Moderate Low 1.4.4 L3 Lead April 2022 Redesign final DOM power consumption measurements Due to high risk probability, terminate work on baseline design and switch to new design with lower power density Additional capEx cost of $40k. Reduced labor required for power monitoring system, some additional labor for power fanout (~40 hrs). Approximately one month schedule delay for timing system and FieldHubs $ 52,000 $40,000 $65,000 4 3 16 100% 4 $ 52,000.00 0 4 $52,000.00 0    
82 TECH45 1.4.3 Because MCA procurement is not finalized, we may have insufficient bandwidth to transmit all data to ICL using the planned cables and comms protocol, which will require additional software or firmware engineering and may reduce science capabilities. Comms bandwidth 8/18/2018 3/1/2022 Low Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low 1.6 L2 lead Until cable procurement is finalized Mitigate Inability to identify supplier for cables with planned comms quality Design protocol for efficiency and robustness, deploy all elements to NTS for integration testing, begin firmware development early if needed; Consider In-OM hit reductions Add engineering effort - 1 FTE yr - to develop better communications protocol. Development schedule permits completion before deployment $200,000 $150,000   $300,000 0 0 26   10% 0 $ 200,000.00 Low 0 $20,000.00 Low    
83 TECH52 1.4.1.1 Because MCA breakout terminations are a custom solution, the costs of breakout installation may exceed the MSU commitment, requiring project support for MCA costs Breakout costs 3/28/2022 High Very low High Very low Low High Low 1.4 L2 Lead Until MCA procurement is finalized: PY4 & PY5 Mitigate Final bids for breakout installation exceed available MSU funds Provide cable samples to multiple potential vendors, explore intial designs and negotiate cost reductions with multiple vendors High cost estimate based on initial bids from two suppliers (JDR and HGS), cost exposure reflects some assumed cost reductions. Schedule risk reflects possibility of extended design phase $400,000 $0 $750,000 0 0 24 50% 0 $ 400,000.00 0 0 $200,000.00 0    
84 TECH46 1.4.1.4 Because the planned YaleGrips have not been demonstrated to work with the planned MCA in a pull test, we may need to increase the YaleGrip tail lengths, which will increase costs YaleGrip size 2/15/2022 3/1/2022 Low Very low Moderate Very low Low Moderate Low 1.4 L2 Lead Until final cable design review Watch Unsatisfactory pull test with prototype cable N/A Replace 461 of YG 944506ET20 quoted @$240 with YG 944507ET22 quoted @$410. Possible longer lead time for custom extended tail grips $78,000 $75,000 $85,000 0 0 12   20% 0 $ 78,000.00 0 0 $15,600.00 0    
85 EXT15 1.4.1.1 Because of supply chain disruptions, we may face delays in production of prototypes and production Main Cables, which will require alternate shipping methods and/or eliminate the option of staging the MCAs at McMurdo the season before installation. Cable delay 1/15/2021 3/1/2022 Moderate High High Very low High High Low 1.4 L2 Lead PY4 & PY5 Mitigate Production is delayed Offer procurement assistance for long-lead items. Invesitgate and qualify alternative suppliers Prototypes for qualifying alt. suppliers ~$75k each. Long-lead procurement assistance risks ~$100k. Few-month scale delays still possible $200,000 $50,000 $225,000 $400,000 26 0 52 25% 26 $ 200,000.00 0 6.5 $50,000.00 0 2021 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $0 $0    
86 EXT21 1.4 Because there is critical in-kind contributed labor from DESY to design and produce the FieldHub electronics and from Uppsala to design the main cables, the project would be impacted if this labor were lost Loss of In-Kind Labor (WBS 1.4) 6/27/2022 7/1/2022 1.4 L2 Lead Until FieldHub shipping Accept Loss of key personnel Complete design and begin production as quickly as possible Estimate 1 FTE-year of engineering labor, 3 month delay from onboarding for FieldHubs. Most cable work is complete so this is a negligible addition $ 150,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 250,000.00 13 4 26   10% 13 $ 150,000.00 0 1.3 $15,000.00 0    
87 1.5 Characterization and Calibration System          
88 EXT16 1.5.2.6 Mini Mainboard may be delayed due to components availailability/supply chain issues MMB delay 1/27/2022 2/28/2022   Moderate High Moderate High High Moderate High 1.5 L2 Lead Williams 2022, calibration module DVT and production Mitigate Parts delivery delays/unavailable parts Obtain key components separately (ahead of time) from turn-key fabrication of Mini-Mainboard assemblies at contract manufacturer. All ICs have been ordered and are now in hand. Design-specific connectors have either been ordered or are in hand. Passive components have been replaced with components with ample stock. $40,000 $20,000 $60,000 13 8 52   20% 13 $ 40,000.00 Low 2.6 $8,000.00 Low    
89 EXT17 1.5.3.5 IDP is unable to provide a winch for dust logging operations as planned in the baseline. Dust logging winch availability issue 1/27/2022 2/28/2022   Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate NSF 2022 discussions with IDP, 2024 testing Early communications Approval delay at IDP, lack of engineering support at IDP Working with IDP to secure the loan of this equipment well in advance of the date needed to allow them ample time to prepare the unit for use. In parallel, ICU is staying in touch with vendors to understand lead times should a winch procurement be required. Risk is retired after testing winch with logger (Spring/Summer 2024). Cost is of purchase of a plausible additional winch if loan is unavailable. $145,000 $140,000 $160,000 8 6 10   20% 8 $ 145,000.00 Moderate 1.6 $29,000.00 Low    
90 EXT22 1.5 Because there is critical in-kind contributed labor from the IceCube M&O effort as well as the stand alone calibration devices which are delivered by a variety of external partners, the project would be impacted if this labor were lost Loss of In-Kind Labor (WBS 1.5) 6/27/2022 L2 Until OM shipping Accept Loss of key personnel Critical labor for calibration devices and analysis of the initial hole ice is in-kind, if it is not available then there will need to be an additional on-project labor estimate, here estimated as 1+/-20% FTE. $ 100,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 120,000.00 12 4 24   15% 12 $ 100,000.00 Low 1.8 $15,000.00 Low    
91 1.6 M&O Data Systems Integration          
92 TECH47 1.6.1.1 If optical sensor or calibration device software interfaces specifications are delayed will impact DAQ software development DAQ software interface delays 8/17/2018     Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Low 1.6 L2 lead Sensor software delivery milestones Better communications Delivery delays Work closely with Sensor and Calibration devices L2s to ensure software interfaces are developed and adhered to. Interface specification workshop Minor cost impact, mostly delays to schedule. Estimate 20 week possible delay, and 0.1 FTE*yr $20,000 $0 $20,000 $40,000 20 10 30 25% 20 $ 20,000.00 0 5 $5,000.00 0    
93 TECH48 1.6.1.1 Because the hit rate from OM devices exceeds the rate available in the DAQ trigger system, and triggers/hits could potentially be missed and physics events missed. DAQ trigger too high 8/17/2018 1/25/2022 (increased probability)   Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate 1.6 L2 lead DAQ software testing Mitigate DAQ trigger testing failures Refactor DAQ trigger algorithms to allow for higher rates, including developing noise rejection methods or look to reduce rate of trigger primitives from modules via cuts Would require potential refactoring of DAQ architecture to support additional rates. If realized, could be an 0.5FTE*yr and 20 week delay $80,000 $40,000 $80,000 $120,000 20 10 30 5% 20 $ 80,000.00 Low (~5% or less of physics hits expected to be impacted by noise cleaning 1 $4,000.00 Low    
94 TECH49 1.6.1.1 If the per-PMT noise rates in mDOMs exceed design specifications, the in-OM data processing and noise mitigation algorithms may not have enough in-OM resources and data could potentially be lost. mDOM noise rates overwhelm MCU 1/25/2022     Moderate Low Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate 1.6 L2 lead Integrated mDOM testing Mitigate MCU can't keep up with rate of mDOM PMTs Use FPGA firmware resources to offload MCU; develop more CPU efficient feature extraction algorithms Minimal cost impacts or schedule impacts: these mitigations are already planned, just need to retune and understand physics impact; 0.1 FTE*yr and 10 week schedule impact potential $20,000 $0 $15,000 $30,000 10 5 15 5% 10 $ 20,000.00 Low (potentially small losses in physics hit fidelity due to reducing CPU/FPGA computing impacts 0.5 $1,000.00 Low    
95 TECH50 1.6.1.1 If an in-ice device could be identified as the wrong type at boot up, improper hardware configuration could be used, leading to damage of components. MCU SW Config ID failure 1/25/2022     Low Very Low Low Low Low Low Low 1.6 L2 lead FAT testing of modules Mitigate Module type incorrectly ID by HW selection and hardware systems potentially damaged Ensure robust testing of all mainboards as early as possible to ID issues with this key circuit; implement additional checks against backup IDs in scratch nvram Addiitional internal software safety checks might be needed. 0.25 FTE*yr, 6 weeks schedule $40,000 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 6 3 9 3% 6 $ 40,000.00 Very low - safety checks to avoid any potential damage 0.18 $1,200.00 Low    
96 TECH51 1.6.1.1 If the total data rate from all connected devices exceeds the total available processing bandwidth, the FieldHub will be unable to keep up with data transfer from all connected devices and data could be lost. FieldHub software unable to keep up 1/25/2022     Low Low Low Low Low Low Low 1.6 L2 lead FieldHub full scale testing at NTS Mitigate Fully loaded field hub can't process all hits from ~100 connected DOMs Scale tests on pre-production field hub units, investigate non-USB transfer mechanisms, parallelism in SBC design. Potentially need to investigate alternative data transfer methods internally, or additional parallelism. Work generally off-Upgrade funding, but potential if M&O resources overwehlmed. $25,000 $0 $20,000 $40,000 20 5 30 5% 20 $ 25,000.00 0 1 $1,250.00 0    
97 EXT23 1.6 Because there is critical in-kind contributed labor from the IceCube M&O project in the firmware and software for the Upgrade, the project would be impacted if this labor were lost Loss of In-Kind Labor (WBS 1.6) 6/27/2022 1.6 L2 lead Until string and software deployment Accept Loss of key personnel Expand software and firmware expertise among as large of a group as possible Development of several key sofware and firmware systems are planned for delivery from M&O support people. These people are supported by NSF grants, which are not gauranteed $ 200,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 300,000.00 26 0 40 25% 26 $ 200,000.00 low 6.5 $50,000.00 Low    
98   Opportunities                            
99 OPP1 1.1 If contributed drillers (from collaborating institutions) are provided as in-kind contributions, the project can save seasonal driller labor costs. Contributed drillers 3/8/2022     Moderate Very low High Very low Low High Low 1.1 PM Ahead of FS1 Opportunity Volunteers from the collaboration Will advertise it widely within the collaboration. Fixed FS years will help significantly. Contributed drillers (up to 10 person*seasons) replace $50000 in direct costs. $250,000 $100,000   $500,000 0 0 0 50% 0 $ 250,000.00 Very low 0 $125,000.00 Low                        
100                                                                                              
101     Retirement home + Deleted risks                                    
102 RET1 1.6.4 If there are delays in design of the IDF, computing infrastructure equipment ordering and shipping could be delayed - retire IDF late design 8/17/2018 7/4/2019 7/4/2019 Low Low Moderate Very low Low Moderate Low 1.6 L2 lead IDF facility design delivery Mitigate IDF Design delays Separate network/computing design elements in the IDF design process, preventing delays in other areas from largely impacting 1.6 Minor cost impact. The IFD is no longer being used in the IceCube Upgrade Project. $0 Low Low Low Very low Low Low Low    
103 RET2 1.6.1.1 If optical sensor or calibration device software interfaces specifications are delayed will impact DAQ software development Includes ICM Firmware Development. This includes the delivery of the CPT infrastructure. (Combined Risks TECH15 and TECH16) COVID-19 DAQ software interface delays Risks: 3, 10 8/17/2018   1/25/2022 Low Moderate Very low Very low high Low Low 1.6 L2 lead Sensor software delivery milestones Better communications Delivery delays Work closely with Sensor and Calibration devices L2s to ensure software interfaces are developed and adhered to. Interface specification workshop. Prioritize remote development efforts, such as FAT software readiness using networked main boards. high moderate low low High Moderate Moderate    
104 RET3 1.6.1 If there are delays in delivery of CPT infrastructure for testing (Field Hubs, SJBs, NTS) then the development of Online Systems will be delayed CPT milestone delays 8/17/2018   1/25/2022 Low Moderate Very low Very low Moderate Low Low 1.6 L2 lead CPT Hardware delivery date Better communications Delivery delays Work closely with CPT L2 and L3s to ensure at least partially hardware delivery for development and testing Minor $0 Low Low Very low Very low Low Low Low    
105 RET4 1.5.1.1 If there are delays in implementation of common calibration database for production calibration, calibration constants may not be stored in easily usable condition Production calibration database 8/17/2018   2/28/2022 Low Low Very low Moderate Low Low Moderate 1.5.1 L3 Lead Williams Module Production Better communications Deliverable delay in 1.5.1.1 Coordinate early between module production sites and 1.5.1 L3 lead but add software labor if needed in PY4-PY5. 2 months software developer effort Low Low Very low Very low Low Low Low    
106 RET5 1.5.1.2 Different module designs may delay implementation of Flashers and other calibration devices,DOM calibration software and interface to DAQ/experiment control DOMcal equivalent 8/17/2018   2/28/2022 Low Low Very low Moderate Low Low Moderate 1.5.1 L3 Lead Williams Module deployment Better communications Deliverable delay in 1.5.1.2 Be pro-active on module calibration implementation and on the software and hardware implementation of the collection of module calibration information; additional SW development may be necessary by PY4 at latest. 2 months software developer effort Low Low Very low Very low Low Low Low    
107 RET6 1.3 If glass spheres have higher than expected radioactive contamination, then quality of optical module data suffers Bad glass 8/2/2018 2/22/2022 High Very low Very low Moderate Low Low High OM Lead Before mDOM / D-Egg FDR Mitigate Test failures Monitor manufacturing, test samples at prototype stage. Some effort may be necessary to handle additional bandwidth in sensor firmware. Additional engineering effort to mitigate - 0.5 FTE yr Moderate Low Moderate Very Low Moderate Moderate Low    
108 RET7 1.2.2 Capstone Microturbine Generators not performing as necessary. Could slow drilling season. No longer applicable Microturbines 8/2/2018 4/4/2019 3/1/2019 Moderate High Moderate Moderate High Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr Until delivery Mitigate Performance Purchase of additional generator unit after drill IVT (PY4) in S Pole environment. The microturbines will not be utilized in Upgrade. Cost of additional C200 cabinet (REMOVE) $199,800 $9,990 $49,950 Low Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low    
109 RET8 1.2.8.5 Discharge of CO2 Fire Suppression System-Asphyxiation - Retire CO2 Discharge 10/9/2019 10/9/2019 12/2/2020 Low High High Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Implementation Mgr 21/22 and 22/23 Mitigate Fire or Accident 1. Disconnect CO2 System.
Very Low Very low Very low Very Low Low Low Low    
110 RET9 1.2.8 If logistics preclude the delivery of shipments for major components, then an additional season might be required. These components are typically: the Drill Hose, Drill Cable, Systems Shipments, DOM, Special Devices, and Surface Cables. COVID-19 Season delay Risks: 4,5, 6, 8, 9 8/2/2018 4/2/2020 2/2/2022 high Moderate Moderate Very low High High Low PM Feyzi During 2022-2023 Pole season Mitigate Problem during season 1. Mitigate underlying reasons for Pole season issues, financial contingency to support additional season. 2. Ship Drill Hose from a C-17, rather than traverse it. 3. Put Drill Cable on a C-17 and ship it to Pole 21-22 season, rather than vesseling it to MCM. 4. To reduce risk in 21-22 Shipments, expedite the completion of remote Design Reviews to add some to the equipment schedules. 5. The main cable and DOMs could withstand a 6-month delay inschedule with no delivery impact. Continue with main cable engineering tasks to keep up with production scheduling. 6. Finalize documentation, firmware, and protype design work as much as possible, remotely. Set-up orders for components. Get a head start on the later design work. Cost of additional seasonal drill and deployment crew for partial season, assuming first season not total miss. moderate Moderate Moderate Very Low Moderate Moderate Low    
111 RET10 1.1.1.1 If project office is not able to closely track international finances, then those cost controls may not succeed, causing schedule delays. In-kind tracking issues 8/2/2018 4/1/2020 Moderate High Moderate Low High Moderate Moderate PM Feyzi Throughout project execution. Mitigate Milestones of in-kind contributions missed. Maintain milestones for in-kind detailed tracking by L2 cost account manager. L2 cost account managers may need additional effort to develop and track milestones. Model as one additional month of key program staff per year for all project years. $127,181 $6,359 $31,795 Low Low High Low Low Moderate Low PY2 PY4    
112 RET11 1.1.3.2 Winter Storage DNF Failure - McMurdo hose storage heat failure, or NPX drill head storage heater/power failure. Duplicate DNF Failure 12/13/2018 1/16/2019 Very low High High Very low Moderate Low Low Haugen 21/22 or 22/23 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Work with ASC to develop back-up plan in the event of long-term power failure. If there is a major power failure at Pole during the winter, the Winterover staff will make corrections ASAP. Very Low Moderate Moderate Low Low Low Low    
113 RET12 1.1.3.1 Domestic/International Shipping Delays - Equipment being shipped to PTH, or via vessel are delayed en route. Duplicate Shipping Delays 12/13/2018 1/16/2019 Low Moderate Moderate Very low Moderate Moderate Low Haugen 21/22 or 22/23 Mitigate Poor performance during the Production phase for Upgrade instrumentation. Schedule CONUS shipments of most critical items with additional time. Plan vessel/traverse shipments with a backup LC130 fly-in plan. Add cost for shipping via air to CHC. Low Low Low Low Low Low Low    
114 RET13 1.1.1 If we do not find a suitable PM, reviews will be delayed and budgets may not be well controlled. Retire PM job 8/2/2018 7/1/2019 Moderate Moderate Low Very low Moderate Moderate Low PI Hanson PY1 Mitigate Job search failure More broadly advertise, raise salary, empower interim and deputy PM Cost of higher PM salary over 4.5 yr $51,508 $12,877 $25,754 Moderate Low Moderate Very Low Moderate Moderate Low    
115 RET14 1.3.1 Opportunity to switch from Hammamatsu to HZC PMTs. HZC tubes are larger and less costly. Better PMTs at Lower Cost 10/1/2018 3/23/2019 High Very Low Very High moderate Low High High 1.3 LEAD Karg 1st Half 2019 Comparison Study Result of Study HZC tubes appear to meet general requirements. Purchase order using new money from KIT will allow Hamamatsu or HZC tube options. Cost impact is within the KIT budget. No remaining risk/opportunity on the NSF end of the project. Cost savings and impacts are in the budgets and schedules now.    
116 RET15 1.3.1 Hamamatsu starts production of PMTs plus HV bases before full base testing is completed Hamamatsu production 12/20/2019 12/20/2019 Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Timo First half of 2020 Mitigate Test failures 1. Work with Hamamatsu for a partial prodution plan to minimize cost impact if different base required. 2. Improve communications between project and Hamamatsu. 3. Expedite testing. Low Low Low Low Low Low Low    
117 RET16 1.3.1 1.3.2 If there is an earthquake in Japan, PMT manufacturing could be severely disrupted Quake PMTs 8/2/2018 Low High High Low Moderate Moderate Low OM lead Until delivery Mitigate Earthquake Alternate PMTs (from Chinese company HZC) could be qualified, cadence of acquisition checked to keep surplus on hand Off NSF budget $0 Low Low Low Very Low Low Low Low    
118 RET17 1.4.4.2 Because of limited electrical infrastructure in ICL, we may need to redesign the power distribution system to reduce power density, which will require additional development effort ICL power 1/27/2022 2/3/2022 High Moderate Moderate very low High High Low CPT Infrastructure Lead       Incorporated into rebaselined plan              
119 RET18 1.1 The Upgrade Project is funded for only 5 strings. Only 5 Strings 1/9/2019 4/4/2019 3/1/2019 Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Hanson 21/22 and 22/23 Mitigate Receipt of funding for only 5 strings Receipt of KIT Funding to cover the additional 2 strings. The KIT Funding is pretty much a given. Risk Exposure Cost is the price of 2 cBLES. Very Low Very Low Very Low Very Low Low Low Low    
120 RET19 1.3.1 If other experiments (KM3NeT, Hyper-K) purchase Hamamatsu 3-inch PMTs in the same time frame as us, Hamamatsu's production capacitites might be insufficient to complete mDOM production in time mDOM PMT 8/13/2018 Moderate High Low Low High Moderate Moderate mDOM lead Until delivery Mitigate Procurement fails Qualify alternate PMT manufacturers; keep close contact with Hamamatsu and responsibles from other experiments Off NSF budget $0 Very Low High Low Low Low Low 0    
121 RET20 1.1 Inability to deploy a full crew to the South Pole for the 2022-2023 Season due to USAP cancelations Crew deployment Risk 2 4/3/2020 4/3/2020 2/1/2022 High High Moderate Low High High Moderate PM FF Drill Season 2020-2021 Mitigate Corona Virus Work with ASC to expedite travel and qualification procedures. Work with a smaller crew if needed at reduced capacity and scope. A large majority of the hot water drill repair work is scheduled for the 2020-2021 season If we are unable to complete this work on-time, the drill/SES may not be ready for full system testing in the 2021-2022 season, and not ready for the drilling of the 7 holes in the 2022-2023 season. High High Moderate Very Low High High Low    
122 RET21 Combined into TECH7, formerly TECH9, now RET21. Major Fire damage to drill infrastructure - Main Heating Plant MHP Fire 10/9/2019 3/2/2022 Low Very High Very High Low Moderate Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Fire in a Hot MDS. 1. Fire Extinguishers 2. Heat Rise Indicator to DCC 3. Smoke Detectors to DCC 4. CO Monitors to DCC 5. Routine checks 6. Training 7. Hardware Safety Mechanisms drill team ~ 8engr + 20techs, ave rate = 88/hr
(3.5mo/12)*1800hr/yr = 525 hr/season
28*88*525 = 1.3M
training = 193k
PQ/travel = 244k
Another drill season = 1.74M
Another offseason (lite) ~ 300k
New MHP ~ $750k
Total = 2.8M
Would need to C17 and LC130 the MHP down
Alt option = WISSARD HPU modules
$2,800,000 $2,000,000 $2,450,000 $2,900,000 52 52 104 Very Low Very Low Very Low Very Low Low Low Low FS3 end $368,625 $368,625 $368,625 $368,625 $368,625    
123 RET22 1.2 Unable to secure full competent team of planned contributed drillers (formerly ORG3), all drillers are in the cost plan Contributed Drillers 3/1/2022 3/2/2022 High High High Moderate High High High PM FS2 & FS3 Watch Unable to secure commitments prior to FS2 Secure commitments early, starting before FS1. Ramp up recruitment starting in FS1 and retain same people through FS3 Need to direct-hire drillers to fill-in planned contributed positions. Est. 10 positions across all FSs @ tech rate ~ $44k per driller $440,000 $350,000 $500,000 4 2 6 Moderate Moderate High Low Moderate High Moderate    
124 RET23 1.2.3 Combined into TECH7+11, this risk, formerly ORG8, is along with the other risks down at the 1% level, even combining them, they end up in the VERY LOW level. During hot-water drilling the main drill head is stuck or frozen-in due to hole constriction or operator error. If not mitigated this could lead to partial loss of season. Stuck Drill 8/15/2018 3/2/2022 Low Very High Very High Low Moderate Moderate Low Implementation Mgr FS3 Mitigate Technical problems or Operator Error Provide robust operator training. Assure hole measuring devices are accurate and reliable. Develop procedure to re-ream narrow areas in hole to assure minimum diameter is maintained. Drill conservatively if possible, purchase additional hose segments and drill head if season appears to be at risk. drill team ~ 8engr + 20techs, ave rate = 88/hr
(3.5mo/12)*1800hr/yr = 525 hr/season
28*88*525 = 1.3M
training = 193k
PQ/travel = 244k
Another drill season = 1.74M
Another offseason (lite) ~ 300k
New Drill hose ~ $1.2M, New Drill cable ~ $350k
Total = 3.6M
Low estimate: stuck at shallow depth, recoverable season, delay of 2 weeks
$500,000 $196,800 $3,600,000 52 52 104 Very Low High High Low Low Low Low FS3 end    
125 RET24 1.3 If one of the planned sensor types does not pass FDR as scheduled the project schedule could be severely disrupted OM FDR 8/13/2018 6/23/2022 Low High Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low OM Lead Until FDR, April 2022 Mitigate FDR fails Design and plan the production capacity of all production facilities with sufficient flexibility to be able to fall back to a different OM type Off NSF budget $ - 0 $0 26 8 52 Low Low Low Very Low Low Low Low    
126 RET25 1.3.1 If bubbles remain in the mDOM Optical Gel, the optical sensitivity of the mDOM might worse than expected mDOM Bubbles 1/27/2022 6/23/2022 Moderate Low Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate mDOM Lead Until FDR, April 2022 Mitigate Design does not meet requirements Optimize surface of support structure (use MJF, chemically smoothing, remove sharp edges)
Implement bubbles in simulations and investigate impact on physics
Gel-pad mDOM: Will delay the start of series production by several months
Off NSF budget $ - 0 $0 4 0 8 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low    
127 RETOPP2 1.1 If no indirect is charged on the PCMS contract, the project will save the indirect cost. No Indirect on PCMS Contract 7/15/2022     Moderate Very low High Very low Low High Low 1.1 PM Ahead of FY23 Enhance Purchasing Department Will work with UW and purchasing to reduce indirect on this services contract. Cost is calculated using the current UW indirect charge of 53% on the FY23-FY26 estimate for the PCMS contract. This total amount is 698,456 from the vendor quote. We have simplified this to $700k. Low estimate assumes we would still pay 53% of the first $25k (as we do with subawards) as administrative fee to set up the requisitions. High estimate assumes no indirect. $686,750 $686,750   $700,000 0 0 0 50% 0 $ 686,750.00   0 $343,375.00 Low                        
128     Notes:                                                                                        
129     1. Risk ID is type of risk and then count up serially. Types of risk are Technical, External, Organizational, and Project Management.                                                                                        
130     2. Risk Description is a complete sentence.                                                                                        
131     3. Risk Title is a very brief description of the risk.                                                                                        
132     4. Technical risks are related to requirements, technology, interfaces, performance and quality.                                                                                        
133     5. External risks are related to suppliers,                                                                                        
134     6. Organizational risks are related to project dependencies, logistics, resources, budget, etc.                                                                                        
135     7. Project Management risks are related to planning, schedule, estimation, controls, communications, etc.                                                                                        
136     8. Risk trigger identifies the risk symptoms or warning signs. It indicates that a risk has occurred or is about to occur.                                                                                        
137     9. Risk score is determined from table in 'Scoring' sheet                                                                                        
138     10. Risk in red is a risk which exceeds the scope of the project. These risk are included in the risk Monte Carlo.                                                                                        
139     11. Risks in blue are logistics-related risks, highlighted so they can be analyzed separately and compared with the shipping analysis.                                                                                        

Back to top


  A B C
1 Date Modified by Description of changes made
2 17-Jan-19 J Haugen Added Change Log tab to track changes made to the Risk Register
3 6-Feb-19 M. Zernick Corrected some formulas/Completed analysis for J. Haugen Risks.
4 11-Feb-19 Zernick/Hanson Costed Opportunity OPP1. Re-analyzed Risk PM2. Added Average Estimate Column.
5 15-Feb-19 M. Zernick Updated PY Remaining Contingency columns to include AVG. Risk Cost. Corrected some earlier risk cost calculations.
6 19-Mar-19 M. Zernick Retired the Micro-turbine Risk: EXT1. Retired 5 Holes Only Risk: ORG 7
7 20-Mar-19 M. DuVernois Minor edits for style and fixed a couple of calculation errors.
8 21-Mar-19 T. DeYoung Reviewed, no changes
9 23-Mar-19 T. Karg Reviewed, no changes
10 23-Mar-19 M. DuVernois Edited HZC opportunity. Retired it.
11 28-Mar-19 D. Williams Reviewed, no changes
12 28-Mar-19 E.Blaufuss Reviewed, no changes
13 31-Mar-19 M. Zernick Reviewed ORG4. No changes.
14 4-Apr-19 M. Zernick Revised Drill Risks as per the 04/03/2019 Drill Risk Meeting. Hid "AVG Cost Column." Changed Drill Lead to Drill MGR. Added Revison Dates.
15 26-Jun-19 M.Zernick Reviewed ORG4. No changes. (WBS 1.1.2.1)
16 26-Jun-19 T. Karg Reviewed WBS 1.3 risks; no changes
17 27-Jun-19 T. DeYoung Clarified wording of TECH2 to reflect baseline geometry. No other changes.
18 28-Jun-19 D. Williams Reviewed 1.5 risks, no changes
19 3-Jul-19 T. Hutchings Reviewed 1.2 risks, no changes
20 3-Jul-19 M. DuVernois Reviewed. No changes.
21 4-Jul-19 E.Blaufuss Reviewed. No changed needed now. Tech risk18 no longer applicable.
22 8-Jul-19 M. Zernick Tech18 Risk is retired. The IDF is no longer being used by the Icecube Upgrade Project.
23 24-Sep-19 M. Zernick Reviewed Risk ORG4. No changes.
24 25-Sep-19 T. Hutchings Reviewed 1.2 risks. No changes
25 27-Sep-19 T. Karg Reviewed 1.3 risks. Extended ORG5 "Optical moduled by air" into PY5 since the last modules will ship one year later if there is no traverse
26 30-Sep-19 D. WIlliams Reviewed 1.5 risks, no changes
27 30-Sep-19 E. Blaufuss Reviewed 1.6 risks, noted retirement of Tech18 per CR#2, dropping IDF from plan.
28 30-Sep-19 M. Zernick Added "Last Modified Date" to TECH18 Risk.
29 2-Oct-19 F. Feyzi Added revised annual estimates based on PY2 detail planning and PY1 actuals
30 9-Oct-19 M. Zernick/TH Added TECH32 and TECH33. (CO2Fire Suppression)/Removed Contingency for retired risks: EXT1, ORG7, and PMI1
31 20-Dec-19 M. DuVernois Added TECH34. (PMT w/base production for mDOM before full testing of base)
32 21-Dec-19 E.Blaufuss Reviewed 1.6 risks, no changes.
33 23-Dec-19 M. Zernick Added Contingency $ to TECH34.
34 26-Dec-19 T. Hutchings Reviewed 1.2 risks. No changes
35 30-Dec-19 T. Karg Reviewed 1.3 risks, no changes
36 30-Dec-19 T. DeYoung TECH31 probablity very low based on Hexatronic sample. Cost exposure should be recalculated
37 30-Dec-19 D. Williams Reviewed 1.5 risks, no changes
38 2-Jan-20 M. Zernick Revised TECH 31: recalulated resultant risk exposure/ Contingency for PY18-19 per TY's changes.
39 6-Jan-20 M. Zernick Revised TECH31: Changed anticipated risk retirement dates from PY1 (18-19) to PY2 (19-20)
40 13-Mar-20 TB/MAZ Added TECH35 to cover frozen drill hose. Clarified distinction between ORG4 and ORG6 regarding injury on the ice.
41 22-Apr-20 MAZ Added COVID-19 Risks: TECH36, TECH37, ORG8, and ORG9. Modified Risk ORG3 to accommodate additional risk incurred by COVID-19
42 18-Jun-20 T. Karg Reviewed 1.3 risks, no changes
43 18-Jun-20 T. DeYoung Reviewed 1.4 risks, no changes
44 18-Jun-20 E. Blaufuss Reviewed 1.6 risks, no changes.
45 23-Jun-20 D. Williams Reviewed 1.5 risks, no changes.
46 25-Sep-20 I. McEwen Updated owner - ORG6, EXT10, TECH19, TECH23, TECH20, ORG1, ORG2, TECH36, EXT1, TECH22, TECH25, TECH26, TECH27, TECH24, TECH5, TECH21, TECH28, TECH29, TECH1, TECH30, TECH32, TECH33, & TECH35 to Implementation Manager
47 26-Sep-20 I. McEwen Adjusted Org 6 language to include both serious accidents and incidents (added) during on-ice activites, not just drilling activities.
48 27-Sep-20 I. McEwen Updated EXT1 Risk language.
49 14-Jan-21 M. DuVernois Typo fixes, formating changes, no content changes.
50 5-Feb-21 FF/MAZ Finalized rebaselined risks.
51 28-Jan-21 M. Zernick Shift all all retired risks to "Low Priority Risk" Status. Only the Re-Baselined Risks remain a priority.
52 24-Feb-21 MAZ, IMc, MR Added 4+4 Risks tab. Added risks.
53 24-Feb-21 M. Zernick Removed EXT15 from Rebaselined RR (Current)
54 16-Mar-21 M. Zernick PMO Risk Review
55 7-May-21 M. Zernick New risk identified for Supplemental Funding. PMO Review
56 19-Jan-22 I. McEwen Adjusted field season references from dates to field season (FS1,FS2, & FS3) lines 4-10
57 25-Jan-22 D. Tosi Added risks to 1.2.9 and 1.2.10 (to be completed)
58 27-Jan-22 T. Karg Retired OPP1, TECH34, Ext2, Ext3. Added new risks in WBS 1.3
59 27-Jan-22 D. Tosi Added Dust Logger Procurement risk to 1.5 (needs to be completed)
60 27-Jan-22 T. DeYoung Added risks to 1.4
61 1-Feb-22 T. DeYoung Removed risks Tech3 (Cable mechanical) and Tech7 (cable timing) as these are now captured in FMEA
62 21-Feb-22 T. Benson Updated TECH36
Named and updated TECH39
Named and updated TECH40 (combined two separate testBed-related controls risks into one, re-rated)
Added TECH41,42,44,45
Updated ratings for ORG6,10,11
Updated TECH23, ORG2, TECH32, TECH22, TECH25, TECH27, TECH20
TECH24 - renamed and updated description
63 2-Mar-22 T. Benson Updated all 1.2 drill risks with exposure values, added Contributed Driller risk
64 3-Mar-22 M. Zernick Updated Major Risk Flags to coincide with RIG requirements.
65 8-Mar-22 M. DuVernois Combined TECH7 & 9. Modified project killer (extra year) risks with mitigations to keep them within the single drill season at best; though could exceed. Added opportunity of contributed drillers. Fixed some cost scorings to match the dollar figures of exposure.
66 8-Apr-22 M. Zernick Corrected ORG1 risk calculation formulas. Added lines where none were.
67 9-Apr-22 V. O'Dell Corrected post-mitigation risk scores
68 17-Jun-22 M. Zernick Added color conditional formatting to Exposure Columns: Y, Z, and AA. Risks for WBS 1.1 are set-up for numbers as well.
69 24-Jun-22 M. Zernick Added Risk: EXT19: Equipment damaged during shipment.
70 27-Jun-22 M. DuVernois Many updates, L2s convert probabilities into numbers from ranges. Also fix "major risk" flags, and add risks for lack of in-kind deliverables.
71 27-Jun-22 M. Zernick Corrected formatting, hid Pre-Mitigation Risk Analysis, columns H-N.
72 27-Jun-22 L2s Checked and edited the "in-kind" contributions external risks
73 24-Jun-22 M.Zernick Finalized Risk Impacts color scheme.
74 1-Jul-22 M.Zernick Minor edits to TECH52.
75 6-Jul-22 M.Zernick Revived an earlier version of Risk register in order to correct the Risk ID Formatting Error.
76 6-Jul-22 I. McEwen Corrected inconsistent registry formatting.
77 6-Jul-22 I. McEwen Added EXT24 to risk register.
78 10-Jul-22 V. O'Dell General cleanup, ensure costs align across risks
79 22-Jul-22 V. O'Dell Add PM3/PM4/TECH53/TECH54. Adjust PM1/PM2 to be more inline with comments from rebaseline review.

Back to top


  A B C D E
1 Risk Probabilities Table Limits for Calculation  
2 Probability of Occurrence Descriptor Numerical Ranges Low High  
3 Very Low < 5% 1% 5%
4 Low 5% - 25% 5% 25%
5 Moderate 25% - 50% 25% 50%
6 High 50% - 75% 50% 75%
7 Very High > 75% 75% 95%  

Back to top


  A B C D E F
1 Impacts
2 Project Objective Very Low Low Moderate High Very High
3 Cost Less than $10k $10k - $50k $50k - $250k $250k - $1M > $1M
4 Time Less than 1 week Month 3 months 6 months Greater than 6 months
5 Scope Scope decreases barely noticeable Minor areas of scope affected Major areas of scope affected Scope reduction unacceptable to sponsor Project item is effectively useless
6 Quality / Performance Quality / performance degradation barely noticeable Only very demanding applications are affected Quality / performance reduction requires sponsor approval Quality / performance degradation unacceptable to sponsor Project item is effectively useless
7 Colors Light Green Green Yellow Orange Red
8            
9            
10            
11            
12            
13            
14            
15            
16       `    

Back to top


  A B C D E F
1 Probability and Impact Matrix for Risk Scoring
2 Probability Impact
3 Very Low Low Moderate High Very High
4 Very High Moderate Moderate High High High
5 High Low Moderate High High High
6 Moderate Low Moderate Moderate High High
7 Low Low Low Moderate Moderate Moderate
8 Very Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
9            
10            
11            
12            
13            
14            
15            
16            
17            
18            
19            

Back to top


  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
1 Technical (TECH) Risk Title Organizational (ORG) Risk Title External (EXT) Risk Title Project Management (PM) Risk Title Retired Risks (RET) Risk Title
2 TECH1 Delay in Drill Control Systems Development Risk 1 ORG1 Optical modules by air EXT1 Fuel Delays PM1 Inflation - Equipment RET1 IDF late design
3 TECH2 Delay in Drill Control Systems Development Risk 2 ORG2 M&O Injury EXT2 DNF Failure PM2 Inflation - Labor RET2 DAQ software interface delays Risks: 3, 10
4 TECH3 Delay in Drill Control Systems Development Risk 3 ORG3 RETIRED: Contributed Drillers EXT3 Traverse Delays PM3 PCMS Issues RET3 CPT milestone delays
5 TECH4 Loss of Drill Expertise (overlap PM2) ORG4 FS3 Serious Driller/Deployer Injury/incident EXT4 Shipping Delays PM4 Logistics/Drill Management RET4 Production calibration database
6 TECH5 Novel String Installation - Equip ORG5 FS2 Serious Driller/Deployer Injury/incident EXT5 ASC Support RET5 DOMcal equivalent
7 TECH6 Unable to dispose of Condensate ORG6 FS1 Serious Driller/Deployer Injury/incident EXT6 Logistics Delays RET6 Bad glass
8 TECH7 Major Equipment Failure ORG7 Driller recruitment EXT7 Logistics and Cargo RET7 Microturbines
9 TECH8 Control System Problem ORG8 Combined into TECH7 EXT8 Drill obstructions RET8 CO2 Discharge
10 TECH9 Combined into TECH7 ORG9 DOM power limit EXT9 mDOM Electronics Supply Chain RET9 Season delay Risks: 4,5, 6, 8, 9
11 TECH10 MHP Failures EXT10 mDOM Support Structure Supply Chain RET10 In-kind tracking issues
12 TECH11 Tower failure EXT11 Sensor Long-Term Storage RET11 DNF Failure
13 TECH12 Drill Head Problems EXT12 Special Device Cancellation RET12 Shipping Delays
14 TECH13 Main Reel Failure EXT13 FieldHub delay RET13 PM job
15 TECH14 Damaged Drill Hose EXT14 White Rabbit supplier RET14 Better PMTs at Lower Cost
16 TECH15 Damaged Drill Cable EXT15 Cable delay RET15 Hamamatsu production
17 TECH16 Frozen Drill Hose EXT16 MMB delay RET16 Quake PMTs
18 TECH17 Motor Drives EXT17 Dust Logger Winch Procurement RET17 ICL power
19 TECH18 HPP Failure EXT18 mDOM mainboard parts availability RET18 Only 5 Strings
20 TECH19 RWP Failure EXT19 Damage to equipment during shipment RET19 mDOM PMT
21 TECH20 IFD Failure EXT20 Loss of in-kind labor (1.3) RET20 Crew deployment Risk 2
22 TECH21 Old EHWD Failure EXT21 Loss of in-kind labor (1.4) RET21 Major fire, combined TECH7 & 9
23 TECH22 Generator Problems EXT22 Loss of in-kind labor (1.5) RET22 Contributed drillers
24 TECH23 Sensor Handling - Sled EXT23 Loss of in-kind labor (1.6) RET23 Hose stuck
25 TECH24 Sensor Handling - Tent EXT24 NSF logitistics success probabilities RET24 OM FDR
26 TECH25 ESD - Handle + Deploy RET25 mDOM Bubbles
27 TECH26 Partial Undeployment of String
28 TECH27 String Partial Loss
29 TECH28 String Total Loss
30 TECH29 Dust Logger Winch
31 TECH30 TU-20 Failure
32 TECH31 RETIRED: OM FDR
33 TECH32 RETIRED: mDOM Bubbles
34 TECH33 mDOM Production Yield
35 TECH34 D-Egg FAT Yield
36 TECH35 PDOM PV leak
37 TECH36 xDOM Electronics ESD Damage
38 TECH37 Main cable design iteration
39 TECH38 Strength member needed
40 TECH39 Deployment procedures
41 TECH40 Alternate cable
42 TECH41 Cable too large
43 TECH42 Cable too heavy
44 TECH43 BCA design iteration
45 TECH44 SCA delay
46 TECH45 Comms bandwidth
47 TECH46 YaleGrip size
48 TECH47 DAQ software interface delays
49 TECH48 DAQ trigger too high
50 TECH49 mDOM noise rates overwhelm MCU
51 TECH50 MCU SW Config ID failure
52 TECH51 FieldHub software unable to keep up
53 TECH52 Optical Gel long-term performance
54 TECH53 Load Sharing
55 TECH54 Drill Advisory Panel
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65    
66    
67    
68    
69    
70    
71    
72    
73    
74    
75    
76    
77    
78    
79    
80    
81    
82    
83    
84    
85    
86    
87    
88    
89    
90    
91    
92    
93    
94    
95    

Back to top