1. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
      1. April 2008
        1. 5. Withdrawal or Termination

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Memorandum of Understanding
for IceCube Maintenance and Operations
between



Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

(on behalf of the University of Wisconsin – Madison)
 
and the

 

Institutions of the IceCube Collaboration
 



April 2008

 

This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) effective April 1, 2008 (“Effective Date”) is between the Institutions of the IceCube Collaboration (“Collaboration” or “Collaborating Institutions”) and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System on behalf of the University of Wisconsin-Madison (“Host Institution”) (collectively the “Parties”). The University of Wisconsin-Madison is both a collaborating institution and the Host Institution for the centrally managed M&O activities. The purpose of this MOU is to define the relationship of the Collaboration and the Host Institution for the Maintenance and Operations (M&O) phase of the IceCube detector and to establish the distribution of responsibilities between the Parties for the execution of M&O activities. The Parties will jointly maintain and operate the IceCube detector which is located at the South Pole Station operated by the National Science Foundation (“NSF”). The Parties share the common goal of enabling the full exploitation of the IceCube detector. Exhibit 1 provides a list of the Collaboration, Institutional Leads and number of Ph.D physicists at each institution.
 
The IceCube M&O program covers the period formally beginning on April 1, 2007, and shall remain in effect while the Host Institution continues to receive NSF funding for this project. Should the NSF Ice Cube Maintenance and Operations Cooperative Agreement to the Host Institution end, the Host Institution may assign its duties and responsibilities under this MOU to another Collaborating Institution. The M&O program includes:
 

1) maintenance and operation of the IceCube detector;
2) maintenance, upgrades, and documentation of the software and computing support required for data analysis;
3) the effort to ensure the integrity of the data;
4) research and development to optimize the existing detector and to manage the technical interfaces with potential expansions of the detector;
5) support for core central staff to ensure continuity of operations; and,
6) general coordination of education and outreach activities.

 
The M&O program comprises all of the actions needed to maintain and operate the individual components of the IceCube detector, along with the directly relevant infrastructure and facilities, in good working order.
 
This MOU does not constitute a legal or contractual obligation on the part of either Party; however, the Parties recognize that the success of the collaboration depends on adherence to its provisions. The Parties agree to negotiate changes to this Memorandum as needed to meet the evolving requirements of the IceCube detector.
 

1. Administration

To ensure the success of the Collaboration, the Host Institution will coordinate the overall IceCube detector M&O program. The Collaborating Institutions agree to provide relevant information on the status of M&O activities as necessary. The Host Institution agrees to make available to the Collaboration general status reports, including financial status and other major issues. The Host Institution agrees to establish and manage segregated accounts for the activities funded in common by the Collaboration (“Common Fund”).
 
The IceCube International Oversight and Finance Group (“IOFG”) is comprised of the major IceCube funding agencies and provides oversight for the IceCube M&O program. The IOFG member agencies are responsible for determining the annual funding for the M&O program, endorsing the arrangements for M&O cost sharing, monitoring and reviewing program implementation.
 
The Host Institution and the Collaboration management will report regularly to the IOFG on technical, managerial, financial and administrative matters, and on the composition of the Collaboration.
 
2. Roles and Responsibilities for Collaborating Institutions
Responsibility for M&O of the IceCube detector rests with the Collaboration as a whole and with the Host Institution. It is a fundamental principle of this agreement that each Institution within the Collaboration shall participate in maintenance and operation of the IceCube detector and contribute an equitable share to these activities. Institutions participating in construction are expected to continue to provide the scientific and technical personnel necessary to sustain the reliable operation of their original contributions. All Institutions are expected to obtain the support necessary from their funding agencies to keep the detector in good working order.
 
An Institution is considered “in good standing” if it has addressed its share for all previous years’ responsibilities. If an Institution is unable to meet its obligations, the Director of Operations will bring this to the attention of the Collaboration Spokesperson, the IceCube Collaboration Board, and the IOFG.

3. M&O Funding
Any Institution that wishes to join the Collaboration during the period of validity of this MOU will be expected to make an appropriate contribution to the M&O program on an annual basis. Collaborating Institutions must contribute to the M&O program in two ways. The first is by contributing to the IceCube Common Fund by providing a combination of cash and/or payment of invoices for Common Fund Tasks. In addition, each institution is expected to contribute its fair share of “in-kind” by completing activities agreed upon by the Collaboration.
 
The Common Fund will be established through dedicated accounts at the Host Institution, which are managed by the Host Institution and monitored by the Collaboration and the IOFG. Any and all monies contributed by the Host Institution, including the funds representing Common Fund payments from the U.S. Collaborating Institutions, shall comply with all terms and conditions associated with the NSF IceCube Maintenance and Operations Cooperative Support Agreement (CSA). This includes, but is not limited to, the NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (FATC) and the Cooperative Agreement Supplemental Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions-Large Facilities (FATC-LG) as referenced in the CSA. In addition, contributions by Collaborating Institutions to the Common Fund are proportional to the number of Ph.D. physicists at the Collaborating Institution. Initially, the contribution per scientist is $9,100 USD which is approximately equivalent to 6460 Euros at the exchange rate of 0.7098 effective on Sept. 24, 2007. For example, three physicists would require a contribution of $27,300 US Dollars for the period of one year. The Host Institution will indicate the exchange rate and Euro equivalent in effect on the date of each invoice sent to collaborating institutions. Exhibit 1 provides the census of IceCube institutional populations as of April 1, 2007. The Collaboration shall update this census annually, by March 31. Authors of IceCube papers must be from Institutions in compliance with this MOU except as provided for in the governance document for joint publications with individuals who are not members of IceCube.
 
In-kind contributions, deliverables provided by Collaborating Institutions, Host Institution Deliverables, and Common Fund Tasks, are determined by the Collaboration on an annual basis. The M&O activities identified as appropriate for support from the Common Fund are those core activities that are agreed to be of common necessity for reliable operation of the IceCube detector. The activities directly support the functions of winter over technical support at South Pole, hardware and software systems for acquiring and filtering data at the South Pole, hardware and software systems for transmitting data via satellite and tape to the UW data center and systems for archiving the data in the central data warehouse at UW. Proposed M&O tasks for PY06-08 are listed by institution in Exhibit 2.

 
4. General Considerations
Employees from Collaborating Institutions with responsibilities that include working at the South Pole Station or other Antarctic bases or sites agree to familiarize themselves with the NSF, Office of Polar Programs’ safety and environmental policies and to adhere to these policies. All fabricated components must be designed, installed and operated in conformity with Collaborating Institution, NSF Office of Polar Programs and Host Institution safety and environmental policies and practices, engineering standards and the IceCube Quality Assurance Plan. The Host Institution will provide copies of the necessary standards and plans. All major components will undergo appropriate design, safety, and engineering reviews with oversight by the Host Institution.
 
The Collaborating Institution agrees to maintain, to the best of its ability, equipment provided for the IceCube detector so long as the Institution is a member of the Collaboration. All equipment, components, and software installed as a part of the IceCube detector and that are integral to the IceCube detector shall remain with the IceCube detector and under the auspices of the IceCube Collaboration Board unless otherwise specified.
 



5. Withdrawal or Termination

The Collaborating Institution may withdraw its support for this MOU by giving not less than a one year written notice to the Collaboration. In such an event, appropriate resolution of the Collaborating Institution’s M&O responsibilities will be negotiated by the Host Institution and ratified by the Collaboration.
 
In the event that one of the Parties commits any breach or default in any of the terms or conditions of this MOU, the Parties will make an effort to resolve the issue. If this fails, the Host Institution will send notice to the Collaboration. In such an event, appropriate resolution will be negotiated through the Collaboration, with consultation with the IOFG as appropriate.
 
6. Approvals
This Memorandum of Understanding will remain in force until the parties mutually agree to modify or terminate it.
 
The following persons are authorized by their respective Parties to approve the terms of this Memorandum of Understanding.
 
7.   Counterparts and Facsimiles
This Memorandum of Understanding may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all together shall constitute but one instrument. This Memorandum of Understanding shall be considered accepted once it has been executed by all of the parties. A signature delivered by facsimile or electronic means will be considered binding for all parties.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Memorandum of Understanding to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first set forth above.

 
 
 
 
University of Wisconsin-Madison    
 
 
 
 
_____________________________
James H. Yeck Date
IceCube Director
 
 
 
_____________________________
Francis Halzen Date
IceCube Principal Investigator
 
 
 
_____________________________
Thomas K. Gaisser Date
IceCube Spokesperson
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Board of Regents of the
University Of Wisconsin System
 
 
 
___________________________
Diane Barrett   Date
Research & Sponsored Programs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborating Institution
 
 
_____________________________

George Japaridze Date

Clark Atlanta University
 
 
_____________________________
Christian Spiering Date
DESY-Zeuthen
 
 
_____________________________

Marek Kowalski Date
Humboldt Universität

 
 
_____________________________
Azriel Goldschmidt Date
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 
 
_____________________________

Elisa Resconi Date

MPI Heidelberg
 
 
_____________________________

Doug Cowen Date

Pennsylvania Sate University
 
 
_____________________________
Christopher Wiebusch Date
RWTH Aachen
 
 
_____________________________
Ali Fazely Date
Southern University
 
 
_____________________________Per Olof Hulth Date
Stockholm University
 
 
_____________________________

Wolfgang Rhode Date

Universität Dortmund
 
 
_____________________________
Lutz Koepke Date
Universität Mainz
 
 
 
_____________________________

Klaus Helbing Date

Universität Wuppertal
 
 
_____________________________

Philippe Herquet Date

Université de Mons-Hainaut
 
 
_____________________________
Daniel Bertrand Date
Université Libre de Bruxelles
 
 
_____________________________

Katherine Rawlins Date

University of Alaska-Anchorage
 
 
_____________________________
Buford Price Date
University of California-Berkeley
 
 
_____________________________

Steven Barwick Date

University of California-Irvine
 
 
_____________________________
Jennifer Adams Date
University of Canterbury
 
 
_____________________________
Shigeru Yoshida Date
University of Chiba
 
 
_____________________________
Paul Evenson Date
University of Delaware
 
 
_____________________________

Dirk Ryckbosch Date

Universiteit Gent
 
 
_____________________________
David Besson Date
University of Kansas
 
 
 
 
 
_____________________________

Greg Sullivan Date

University of Maryland
 
 
_____________________________
Subir Sarkar Date
University of Oxford
 
 
_____________________________
Albrecht Karle Date
UW-Madison
 
 
_____________________________
James Madsen Date
UW-River Falls
 
 
_____________________________

Olga Botner Date

Uppsala University
 
 
_____________________________
Nick van Eijndhoven Date
Utrecht University
 
 
_____________________________

Catherine De Clercq Date

Vrije Universiteit Brussel
 
 
_____________________________

Mathieu Ribordy Date

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Funding Authority
 
 
 
 
______________________________
Dr. Ir. Elisabeth Monard Date
Secretary General FWO for Universiteit Gent and
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
 
 
 
______________________________
Mrs. M-J Simoen Date
Secrétaire Générale du FNRS for
Université Libre de Bruxelles and
Université de Mons-Hainaut
 
 
 
 
 
 
______________________________

Lars Borjesson Date

Swedish Research Council for
Stockholm University and
Uppsala University
 
 
 
______________________________James Symons Date
Nuclear Science Division Director
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 
 
 
______________________________Dr. Stephen Conway Date
Head of Research Services
Science Area
University of Oxford
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  

Exhibit 1: IceCube Collaborating Institutions, Institutional Leads, and Funding Agencies
 

Collaborating Institution Institutional Lead
Scientists
Funding Agency
University of Alaska-Anchorage
K. Rawlins
1
NSF
Clark Atlanta University
G. Japaridze
2
NSF
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (UCB) R. Stokstad
7
NSF
Pennsylvania State University D. Cowen
7
NSF
Southern University A. Fazely
4
NSF
University of California-Berkeley B. Price
6
NSF
University of California-Irvine S. Barwick
1
NSF
University of Delaware T. Gaisser
9
NSF
University of Kansas D. Besson
1
NSF
University of Maryland G. Sullivan
7
NSF
University of Wisconsin-River Falls J. Madsen
2
NSF
University of Wisconsin-Madison A. Karle
21
NSF
RWTH Aachen C. Wiebusch
1
BMBF, DFG
DESY-Zeuthen C. Spiering
9
DESY
Stockholm University P. Hulth
5
SRC
Universitaet Dortmund W. Rhode
2
BMBF
Universitaet Mainz L. Koepke
1
BMBF
Universitaet Wuppertal K. Helbing
3
BMBF
Universite Libre de Bruxelles D. Bertrand
1
FNRS
MPI Heidelberg E. Resconi
2
DFG
Humboldt Universitaet Berlin M. Kowalski
2
DFG
Universite de Mons-Hainaut P. Herquet
1
FNRS
University of Canterbury J. Adams
2
NSF
University of Chiba S. Yoshida
3
JSPS
University of Gent D. Ryckbosch
1
FWO
Utrecht University N. van Eijndhoven
1
NWO
Uppsala University O. Botner
3
SRC
Vrije Universiteit Brussel C. De Clercq
1
FWO
University of Oxford S. Sarkar
2
STFC
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne M. Ribordy
2
SNSF


 
 
Exhibit 2: Deliverables by Institution and Institutional Responsibilities
This table lists the M&O and analysis responsibilities of each institution. For each institution, M&O activities are listed on the first line and analysis activities on the second line. All groups participate in detector operations by taking two-week shifts to monitor IceCube runs. Number of shifts is proportional to number of IceCube scientists at each institution. Administration of working groups (WG) and committees is shared by multiple institutions; only the institution of the chair of each group is indicated below. Listed activities refer specifically to PY07; they are expected to evolve with time. UW M&O numbers include winter-over personnel. Numbers in [square brackets] under M&O specify the service component of operations associated with supplements to base grants.
 
 
 
 

 
Institution
 
Funds
 
Activity
FTE and Equipment

      PY07 PY08 PY09
      total [service] total [serv.] total [serv.]
University of Alaska-Anchorage M&O Maintenance of IceTray/icerec software for coincident events 0.1 0.1 0.1
  Analysis Coincident event analysis for composition 0.12 0.12 0.12
Clark Atlanta University M&O Geometry verification and hit cleaning; simulation production 0.3 1.5 1.5
  Analysis GRB neutrino search using time profile stacking 0.3 0.25 0.25
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (via UCB) M&O DAQ maintenance; Run coordination; Detector Calibration; Publication Com. 2.22 [0.7] 1.21 [0.66] 1.21 [0.66]
  Analysis
 
Diffuse cascades, point sources with muon neutrinos; high-Pt muons in cosmic rays; parallel upward tracks; Cascade WG; Diffuse WG 1.5 2.5 2.5
Pennsylvania State University M&O
 
Verification, high level monitoring; trigger; calibration 1.69 [1.07] 0.82 [0.82] 0.82 [0.82]
  Analysis Low-energy neutrinos, including AMANDA in IceCube; atmospheric electron neutrinos; Tau neutrinos; Hybrid and tau channel WG 2.54 2.59 3.0
Southern University M&O Simulation production 0.4 0.4 0.4
  Analysis Supernovae; oscillations; WIMPs 1.4 1.4 1.4
 
University of California-Berkeley
 
M&O Calibration; monitoring 1.29 [0.83] 0.91 [0.91] 0.91 [0.91]
  Analysis
 
Ice Properties; standard candle analysis; GRBs; gamma-ray astronomy with IceCube; Exotic particle searches; acoustic R&D; Exotic events WG; GRB WG 1.50 1.71 1.57
University of California-Irvine M&O EHE event simulation 0.16 0.16 0.16
  Analysis GRBs; EHE neutrinos 1.2 1.2 1.2
University of Delaware M&O
 
Monitor IceTop data and detector performance and recalibrate; IceTop maintenance 2.38 [0.95] 1.94 [0.95] 1.94 [1.42]
  Analysis Cosmic-ray WG; coincident event analysis; atmospheric neutrinos; GZK neutrinos; Monitor solar activity; Radio R&D 2.52 2.89 4.86
University of Kansas M&O Support development of new technology 0.1 0.1 0.1
  Analysis TBD      
University of Maryland
 
M&O Support IceTray software framework; on-line filter; simulation production; Tier 2 support; TFT board 2.00 [0.75] 2.51 [1.01] 2.51 [1.01]
  Analysis Analysis of neutrino-induced muons and downward muons; GRBs; WIMPs; beyond-standard model physics; atmospheric neutrinos; muon channel WG 2.73 2.54 2.69
University of Wisconsin-River Falls M&O Outreach; support IceTop re-survey 0.2 0.2 0.2
  Analysis To be determined      
University of Wisconsin-Madison M&O Simulation production; analysis coordination; DAQ maintenance; Manage SPS, SPTS, winter-over personnel, data warehouse, web page, and outreach; administer M&O grant; coordinate simulation production; provide core computing infrastructure and DAQ maintenance; coordinate distributed CPU resources; support R&D 17.67 [2.42] 20.40 [3.34] 20.40 [3.34]
  Analysis Analysis coordinator; Atmospheric neutrino WG; point source WG; diffuse WG; atmospheric neutrinos; atmospheric muons; point sources; diffuse flux; EHE-GZK search; gamma ray bursts; supernova; WIMP search; cosmic-ray physics, downward muons 12.17 10.54 11.29
RWTH Aachen M&O Support AMANDA TWR DAQ; support simulation; DeepCore support; D-grid-computing 0.8 1.0 1.2
  Analysis Low-energy neutrinos; diffuse & atmospheric neutrinos, point sources Acoustic R&D 1.4 3.0 4.0
DESY-Zeuthen M&O European data center; DAQ maintenance (DOR card); simulation production; Speakers’ Committee 4.5 4.7 4.8
  Analysis Point source WG; multi-messenger astronomy; monopoles; Energy spectrum with IceTop-16; Acoustic R&D; atmospheric neutrinos; cascades 6.4 7 7
Stockholm University M&O Nordic Grid simulation 2.9 2.8 2.8
  Analysis WIMP WG; WIMP search; UHE events; low-energy neutrinos 2.3 2.3 2.3
Universitaet Dortmund M&O Support simulation and verification 0.4 0.5 0.5
  Analysis Point source search; diffuse & atmospheric neutrinos 2.2 2.2 2.2
 
Universitaet Mainz M&O Supernova system operation and monitoring 0.4 0.4 0.4
  Analysis Supernovae; SN WG 2.8 2.8 2.8
Universitaet Wuppertal M&O Simulation production; support TWR DAQ; DAQ maintenance (DOR card) 1.4 1.2 1.2
  Analysis Air shower analysis techniques; direct SUSY detection; multi-track EHE; radio, acoustic R&D 3.0 3.2 3.2
Universite Libre de Bruxelles M&O GRID computing, simulation 0.75 0.75 0.75
  Analysis WIMPs; point source searches 2.0 2.0 2.0
MPI Heidelberg M&O Support verification 0.2 0.2 0.2
  Analysis Point source; multi-messenger astronomy 1.6 1.6 1.6
Humboldt Universitaet Berlin M&O Support simulation, verification; optical follow-up of IceCube events (PY08) 0.5 0.5 0.5
  Analysis Cascades, GRBs and supernovae; cosmic-ray physics with IceTop; R&D for optical follow-up of IceCube events 1.5 1.5 1.5
Universite de Mons-Hainaut M&O Data base maintenance; simulation 0.7 0.5 0.3
  Analysis Amanda TWR (PY07 only); exotic particle searches with IceCube 1.7 1.1 1.0
University of Canterbury M&O Simulation 0.5 0.6 0.7
  Analysis WIMPs; cascades; radio R& D 2.3 2.3 2.3
Chiba University M&O PMT calibration; maintain simulation tools; MC data production 1.2 1.2 1.2
  Analysis EHE WG; GZK neutrinos; large events; large events in coincidence with IceTop 2 2 2
University of Gent M&O Simulation for IceTop 0.3 0.3 0.4
  Analysis Shower front shape and fluctuations; horizontal air showers 1.7 1.7 1.7
Utrecht University M&O Support verification 0.2 0.2 0.2
  Analysis GRB analysis 2.4 2.4 2.4
Uppsala University M&O GRID computing, simulation 0.4 0.4 0.4
  Analysis WIMP search; GRB 1.9 1.9 1.9
Vrije Universiteit Brussel M&O GRID computing for simulation 0.75 0.75 0.75
  Analysis WIMP searches 2.0 2.0 2.0
University of Oxford M&O Yellow book 0.5 0.5 0.5
  Analysis GZK neutrinos; Exotic particle searches 0.5 0.5 0.5
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne M&O Simulation; IceTop Calibration; a
support acoustic R&D
0.4 0.4 0.4
  Analysis EHE neutrinos; Atm. neutrinos, multi-messenger point sources 2.2 2.2 2.2

 
 

Back to top



1

 

 
 
3

 

 
 
5

 

 
 
7